THE SMEAR LAYER - A PHENOMENON IN ROOT-CANAL THERAPY

被引:180
作者
SEN, BH
WESSELINK, PR
TURKUN, M
机构
[1] Department of Endodontics, Ege University, İzmir
[2] Department of Cariology and *Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam
关键词
BACTERIAL PENETRATION; MICROLEAKAGE; ROOT CANAL DISINFECTANTS; ROOT CANAL SEALERS; SMEAR LAYER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00289.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
When the root canals are instrumented during endodontic therapy, a layer of material composed of dentine, remnants of pulp tissue and odontoblastic processes, and sometimes bacteria, is always formed on the canal walls. This layer has been called the smear layer. It has an amorphous, irregular and granular appearance under the scanning electron microscope. The advantages and disadvantages of the prescence of smear layer, and whether it should be removed or not from the instrumented root canals, are still controversial. It has been shown that this layer is not a complete barrier to bacteria and it delays but does not abolish the action of endodontic disinfectants. Endodontic smear layer also acts as a physical barrier interfering with adhesion and penetration of sealers into dentinal tubules, in turn, it may affect the sealing efficiency of root canal obturation. When it is not removed, the durability of the apical and coronal seal should be evaluated over a long period. If smear layer is to be removed, EDTA and NaOCl solutions have been shown to be effective, among various irrigation solutions and techniques, including ultrasonics, that have been tested. Once this layer is removed, it should be borne in mind that there is a risk of reinfecting dentinal tubules if the seal fails. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical importance of the absence or presence of smear layer.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 91 条
[61]  
Mccomb D, Smith DC, Beagrie GS, The results of in two endodontic chemomechanical instrumentation –a scanning electron microscopic study, Journal of the British Endodontic Society, 9, pp. 11-18, (1976)
[62]  
Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD, Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls, Journal of Endodontics, 10, pp. 477-483, (1984)
[63]  
Madison S, Krell KV, Comparison of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and sodium hypochlorite on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth, Journal of Endodontics, 10, pp. 499-503, (1984)
[64]  
Martin H., Cunningham MJ, Norris JP, Cotton WR, Ultrasonic versus hand filing of dentin: A quantitative study, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 49, pp. 79-81, (1980)
[65]  
Martin H, Cunningham MJ, Endosonic endodontics. the ultrasonic synergistic system, Techniques in Clinical Endodontics, pp. 316-322, (1983)
[66]  
Meryon SD, Brook AM, Penetration of dentine by three oral bacteria in vitro and their associated cytotoxicity, International Endodontic Journal, 23, pp. 196-202, (1990)
[67]  
Meryon SD, Jakeman KJ, Browne RM, Penetration in vitro of human and ferret dentine by three bacterial species in relation to their potential role in pulpal inflammation, International Endodontic Journal, 19, pp. 213-220, (1986)
[68]  
Meryon SD, Tobias RS, Jakeman KJ, Smear removal agents: A quantitative study in vivo and in vitro, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 57, pp. 174-179, (1987)
[69]  
Michelich VJ, Schuster GS, Pashley DH, Bacterial penetration of human dentin in vitro, Journal of Dental Research, 59, pp. 1398-1403, (1980)
[70]  
Mjor JA., Tronstad L, Experimentally induced pulpitis, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 34, pp. 102-108, (1972)