Performance characterization of Siemens Primus linear accelerator under small monitor unit and small segments for the implementation of step-and-shoot intensitymodulated radiotherapy

被引:9
作者
Reena, P. [1 ]
Dayananda, S. [2 ]
Pai, Rajeshri [1 ]
Jamema, S. V. [2 ]
Gupta, Tejpal [1 ]
Deepak, D. [2 ]
Rajeev, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] ACTREC, Dept Radiat Oncol, TMC, New Mumbai, India
[2] Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Med Phys, TMC, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Performance characterization; small monitor unit; small segment; step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy;
D O I
10.4103/0971-6203.29197
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Implementation of step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) needs careful understanding of the accelerator start-up characteristic to ensure accurate and precise delivery of radiation dose to patient. The dosimetric characteristic of a Siemens Primus linear accelerator (LA) which delivers 6 and 18 MV x-rays at the dose rate of 300 and 500 monitor unit (MU) per minutes (min) respectively was studied under the condition of small MU ranging from 1 to 100. Dose monitor linearity was studied at different dose calibration parameter (D1_C0) by measuring ionization at 10 cm depth in a solid water phantom using a 0.6 cc ionization chamber. Monitor unit stability was studied from different intensity modulated (IM) groups comprising various combinations of MU per field and number of fields. Stability of beam flatness and symmetry was investigated under normal and IMRT mode for 20x20 cm(2) field under small MU using a 2D Profiler kept isocentrically at 5 cm depth. Inter segment response was investigated form 1 to 10 MU by measuring the dose per MU from various IM groups, each consisting of four segments with inter-segment separation of 2 cm. In the range 1-4 MU, the dose linearity error was more than 5% (max -32% at 1 MU) for 6 MV x-rays at factory calibrated D1_C0 value of 6000. The dose linearity error was reduced to -10.95% at 1 MU, within -3% for 2 and 3 MU and +/- 1% for MU >= 4 when the D1_C0 was subsequently tuned at 4500. For 18 MV x-rays, the dose linearity error at factory calibrated D1_C0 value of 4400 was within +/- 1% for MU >= 3 with maximum of -13.5 observed at 1 MU. For both the beam energies and MU/field >= 4, the stability of monitor unit tested for different IM groups was within +/- 1% of the dose from the normal treatment field. This variation increases to -2.6% for 6 MV and -2.7% for 18 MV x-rays for 2 MU/field. No significant variation was observed in the stability of beam profile measured from normal and IMRT mode. The beam flatness was within 3% for 6 MV x-rays and more than 3% (Max 3.5%) for 18 MV x-rays at lesser irradiation time <= 3 MU. The beam stability improves with the increase in irradiation time. Both the beam energies show very good symmetry (<= 2%) at all irradiation time. For all the three segment sizes studied, the nonlinearity was observed at smaller MU/segment in both the energies. When the MU/segment is >= 4, all segment size shows fairly linear relation with dose/MU. The smaller segment size shows larger nonlinearity at smaller MU/segment and become more linear at larger MU/segment. Based on our study, we conclude that the Primus LA from Siemens installed at our hospital is ideally suited for step-and-shoot IMRT preferably for radiation ON time >= 4MU per segment.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: Delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units [J].
Aspradakis, MM ;
Lambert, GD ;
Steele, A .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (04) :233-242
[2]   TELETHERAPY BEAM CHARACTERISTICS - THE 1ST 2ND [J].
BARISH, RJ ;
FLEISCHMAN, RC ;
PIPMAN, YM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (04) :657-661
[3]   MLC dosimetric characteristics for small field and IMRT applications [J].
Bayouth, JE ;
Morrill, SM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) :2545-2552
[4]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Butler, EB ;
DiPetrillo, TA ;
Engler, MJ ;
Fraass, B ;
Grant, W ;
Ling, CC ;
Low, DA ;
Mackie, TR ;
Mohan, R ;
Purdy, JA ;
Roach, M ;
Rosenman, JG ;
Verhey, LJ ;
Wong, JW ;
Cumberlin, RL ;
Stone, H ;
Palta, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04) :880-914
[5]   Startup performance of the traveling wave versus standing wave linear accelerator [J].
Buchgeister, M ;
Nusslin, F .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (04) :493-495
[6]   Comparison of beam characteristics in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and those under normal treatment condition [J].
Cheng, CW ;
Das, IJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (02) :226-230
[7]   DOSIMETRIC ACCURACY AT LOW MONITOR UNIT SETTINGS [J].
DAS, IJ ;
KASE, KR ;
TELLO, VM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (765) :808-811
[8]   Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [J].
Ezzell, GA ;
Galvin, JM ;
Low, D ;
Palta, JR ;
Rosen, I ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Xia, P ;
Xiao, Y ;
Xing, L ;
Yu, CX .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2089-2115
[9]   Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: A joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine [J].
Galvin, JM ;
Ezzell, G ;
Eisbrauch, A ;
Yu, C ;
Butler, B ;
Xiao, Y ;
Rosen, I ;
Rosenman, J ;
Sharpe, M ;
Xing, L ;
Xia, P ;
Lomax, T ;
Low, DA ;
Palta, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (05) :1616-1634
[10]   Monitor unit settings for intensity modulated beams delivered using a step-and-shoot approach [J].
Sharpe, MB ;
Miller, BM ;
Yan, D ;
Wong, JW .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (12) :2719-2725