Monitor unit settings for intensity modulated beams delivered using a step-and-shoot approach

被引:64
作者
Sharpe, MB [1 ]
Miller, BM [1 ]
Yan, D [1 ]
Wong, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
radiation therapy; conformal radiotherapy; intensity modulation; IMRT; dosimetry; beam commissioning; quality assurance; multileaf collimator; output factors;
D O I
10.1118/1.1328383
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Two linear accelerators have been commissioned for delivering IMRT treatments using a step-and-shoot approach. To assess beam startup stability for 6 and 18 MV x-ray beams, dose delivered per monitor unit (MU), beam flatness, and beam symmetry were measured as a function of the total number of MU delivered at a clinical dose rate of 400 MU per minute. Relative to a 100 MU exposure, the dose delivered per MU by both linear accelerators was found to be within +/-2% for exposures larger than 4 MU. Beam flatness and symmetry also met accepted quality assurance standards for a minimum exposure of 4 MU. We have found that the performance of the two machines under study is well suited to the delivery of step-and-shoot IMRT. A system of dose calculation has also been commissioned for applying head scatter corrections to fields as small as 1x1 cm(2). The accuracy and precision of the relative output calculations in water was validated for small fields and fields offset from the axis of collimator rotation. For both 6 and 18 MV x-ray beams, the dose per MU calculated in a water phantom agrees with measured data to within 1% on average, with a maximum deviation of 2.5%. The largest output factor discrepancies were seen when the actual radiation field size deviated from the set field size. The measured output in water can vary by as much 16% for 1x1 cm2 fields, when the measured field size deviates from the set field size by 2 mm. For a 1 mm deviation, this discrepancy was reduced to 8%. Steps should be taken to ensure collimator precision is tightly controlled when using such small fields. If this is not possible, very small fields should not contribute to a significant portion of the treatment, or uncertainties in the collimator position may effect the accuracy of the dose delivered. (C) 2000 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(00)01812-5].
引用
收藏
页码:2719 / 2725
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   TELETHERAPY BEAM CHARACTERISTICS - THE 1ST 2ND [J].
BARISH, RJ ;
FLEISCHMAN, RC ;
PIPMAN, YM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (04) :657-661
[2]   Evidence for a significant timer error on a linear accelerator: consequences for a special therapy application [J].
Biggs, PJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10) :3139-3143
[3]  
BJARNGARD BE, 1990, MED PHYS, V17, P794, DOI 10.1118/1.596475
[4]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[5]   OPTIMIZATION OF STATIONARY AND MOVING BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY TECHNIQUES [J].
BRAHME, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 12 (02) :129-140
[6]   Startup performance of the traveling wave versus standing wave linear accelerator [J].
Buchgeister, M ;
Nusslin, F .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (04) :493-495
[7]   THE GENERATION OF INTENSITY-MODULATED FIELDS FOR CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY BY DYNAMIC COLLIMATION [J].
CONVERY, DJ ;
ROSENBLOOM, ME .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (06) :1359-1374
[8]   DOSIMETRIC ACCURACY AT LOW MONITOR UNIT SETTINGS [J].
DAS, IJ ;
KASE, KR ;
TELLO, VM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (765) :808-811
[9]   Diamond detector measurements near simulated air channels for narrow photon beams [J].
De Vlamynck, K ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, W .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 53 (02) :155-159
[10]   COMBINING MULTILEAF FIELDS TO MODULATE FLUENCE DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
GALVIN, JM ;
CHEN, XG ;
SMITH, RM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (03) :697-705