GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION OF METAANALYSIS IN ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

被引:75
作者
BLAIR, A
BURG, J
FORAN, J
GIBB, H
GREENLAND, S
MORRIS, R
RAABE, G
SAVITZ, D
TETA, J
WARTENBERG, D
WONG, O
ZIMMERMAN, R
机构
[1] ILSI, RSI, WASHINGTON, DC 20037 USA
[2] AGCY TOX SUBST DIS REGISTRY, ATLANTA, GA USA
[3] NCI, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
[4] US EPA, WASHINGTON, DC 20460 USA
[5] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, SCH PUBL HLTH, LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 USA
[6] MED COLL WISCONSIN, MILWAUKEE, WI 53226 USA
[7] MOBIL OIL CORP, PRINCETON, NJ 08540 USA
[8] UNIV N CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL, NC 27515 USA
[9] UNION CARBIDE CORP, DANBURY, CT USA
[10] ENVIRONM & OCCUPAT HLTH SCI INST, PISCATAWAY, NJ USA
[11] APPL HLTH SCI, SAN MATEO, CA USA
[12] NYU, NEW YORK, NY 10012 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/rtph.1995.1084
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The use of meta-analysis in environmental epidemiology can enhance the value of epidemiologic data in debates about environmental health risks. Meta-analysis may be particularly useful to formally examine sources of heterogeneity, to clarify the relationship between environmental exposures and health effects, and to generate information beyond that provided by individual studies or a narrative review. However, meta-analysis may not be useful when the relationship between exposure and disease is obvious, when there are only a few studies of the key health outcomes, or when there is substantial confounding or other biases which cannot be adjusted for in the analysis. Recent increases in the use of meta-analysis in environmental epidemiology have highlighted the need for guidelines for the application of the technique, Guidelines, in the form of desirable and undesirable attributes, are presented in this paper for various components of a metaanalysis including study identification and selection; data extraction and analysis; and interpretation, presentation, and communication of results, Also discussed are the appropriateness of the use of meta-analysis in environmental health studies and when metaanalysis should or should not be used. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] A RANDOM-EFFECTS REGRESSION-MODEL FOR METAANALYSIS
    BERKEY, CS
    HOAGLIN, DC
    MOSTELLER, F
    COLDITZ, GA
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (04) : 395 - 411
  • [2] METAANALYSIS OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC DOSE-RESPONSE DATA
    BERLIN, JA
    LONGNECKER, MP
    GREENLAND, S
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (03) : 218 - 228
  • [3] CANCER AMONG FARMERS - A REVIEW
    BLAIR, A
    MALKER, H
    CANTOR, KP
    BURMEISTER, L
    WIKLUND, K
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1985, 11 (06) : 397 - 407
  • [4] CLUES TO CANCER ETIOLOGY FROM STUDIES OF FARMERS
    BLAIR, A
    ZAHM, SH
    PEARCE, NE
    HEINEMAN, EF
    FRAUMENI, JF
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1992, 18 (04) : 209 - 215
  • [5] EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FORMALDEHYDE EXPOSURE AND CANCER
    BLAIR, A
    SARACCI, R
    STEWART, PA
    HAYES, RB
    SHY, C
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1990, 16 (06) : 381 - 393
  • [6] A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL
    CHALMERS, TC
    SMITH, H
    BLACKBURN, B
    SILVERMAN, B
    SCHROEDER, B
    REITMAN, D
    AMBROZ, A
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1981, 2 (01): : 31 - 49
  • [7] METAANALYSIS - STATE-OF-THE-SCIENCE
    DICKERSIN, K
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1992, 14 : 154 - 176
  • [8] THE EXISTENCE OF PUBLICATION BIAS AND RISK-FACTORS FOR ITS OCCURRENCE
    DICKERSIN, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1385 - 1389
  • [9] BIAS IN THE ONE-STEP METHOD FOR POOLING STUDY RESULTS
    GREENLAND, S
    SALVAN, A
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (03) : 247 - 252