LEARNED PREFERENCES FOR REAL-FED AND SHAM-FED POLYCOSE IN RATS - INTERACTION OF TASTE, POSTINGESTIVE REINFORCEMENT, AND SATIETY

被引:27
作者
SCLAFANI, A [1 ]
NISSENBAUM, JW [1 ]
ACKROFF, K [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY,GRAD SCH,BROOKLYN,NY 11210
关键词
FLAVOR PREFERENCE CONDITIONING; POSTINGESTIVE REINFORCEMENT; POSTINGESTIVE SATIETY;
D O I
10.1016/0031-9384(94)90203-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences have been obtained with a variety of procedures, but one study indicates that rats do not readily learn to prefer the flavor of real-fed food to the flavor of sham-fed food. This issue was reexamined in food-deprived rats trained to real feed (gastric fistula closed) and sham feed (gastric fistula open) different flavored Polycose solutions (cherry or grape). Sham-feeding intakes in the one-bottle training sessions (30 min) were limited to the amount consumed in real-feeding sessions; intakes were not limited during two-bottle preference tests (10 min). In Experiment 1, when tested with 32% Polycose solutions, the animals tended to prefer the sham-fed Polycose to the real-fed Polycose. When subsequently trained and tested with 8% Polycose solutions, the same animals displayed a strong preference (approximate to 90%) for the real-fed Polycose. These findings were confirmed in Experiment 2 using separate groups. Rats trained with 8% Polycose readily learned to prefer the real-fed solution, and rats trained with 32% Polycose initially preferred the sham-fed Polycose solution. With additional training the 32% Polycose group developed a preference for the real-fed solution. In Experiment 3, rats trained to real feed flavored 8% and 32% Polycose solutions developed strong preferences for the 32% solution. This finding suggests that the tendency to prefer sham-fed to real-fed 32% Polycose is not due to aversive postingestive effects of the real-fed solution. Taken together, the results indicate that Polycose has a postingestive positive reinforcing effect that can be revealed using the sham-feeding preparation. The lack of an immediate preference for real-fed over sham-fed 32% Polycose may occur because 1) postingestive reinforcement only slightly improves the already highly preferred taste of the real-fed solution and 2) postingestive satiety reduces the attractiveness of the real-fed solution.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 337
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   TRUE, SHAM, AND ESOPHAGEAL FEEDING AS REINFORCEMENTS [J].
HULL, CL ;
LIVINGSTON, JR ;
ROUSE, RO ;
BARKER, AN .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1951, 44 (03) :236-245
[12]   COMPENSATORY AND CONDITIONED FEEDING RESPONSES TO SCHEDULED GLUCOSE INFUSIONS IN RAT [J].
MATHER, P ;
NICOLAIDIS, S ;
BOOTH, DA .
NATURE, 1978, 273 (5662) :461-463
[13]   RELEASE OF FEEDING BY THE SWEET TASTE IN RATS - OROPHARYNGEAL SATIETY [J].
MOOK, DG ;
BRYNER, CA ;
RAINEY, LD ;
WALL, CL .
APPETITE, 1980, 1 (04) :299-315
[14]   SHAM-FEEDING RESPONSE OF RATS TO POLYCOSE AND SUCROSE [J].
NISSENBAUM, JW ;
SCLAFANI, A .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1987, 11 (02) :215-222
[15]  
NISSENBAUM JW, 1988, P E PSYCHOL ASS M, V59, P18
[16]  
NISSENBAUM JW, 1987, P E PSYCHOL ASS M, V58, P62
[17]   CARBOHYDRATE TASTE, APPETITE, AND OBESITY - AN OVERVIEW [J].
SCLAFANI, A .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1987, 11 (02) :131-153
[18]   IS GASTRIC SHAM FEEDING REALLY SHAM FEEDING [J].
SCLAFANI, A ;
NISSENBAUM, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 248 (03) :R387-R390
[19]  
SCLAFANI A, 1990, TASTE, EXPERIENCE, AND FEEDING, P139, DOI 10.1037/10075-010
[20]   ROBUST CONDITIONED FLAVOR PREFERENCE PRODUCED BY INTRAGASTRIC STARCH INFUSIONS IN RATS [J].
SCLAFANI, A ;
NISSENBAUM, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 255 (04) :R672-R675