Quality management practices and their impact on performance

被引:167
作者
Lakhal, Lassaad [1 ]
Pasin, Federico [2 ]
Limam, Mohamed [3 ]
机构
[1] Fac Droit Sci Econom Politiques Sousse Tunisia, Sousse, Tunisia
[2] HEC Montreal, Montreal, PQ H1C, Canada
[3] ISG Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
Quality management; Performance measurement (quality); Modelling;
D O I
10.1108/02656710610672461
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to explore the relationship between quality management practices and their impact on performance. Design/methodology/approach - First, critical quality management practices are identified and classified in three main categories: management, infrastructure, and core practices. Then, a model linking these practices and performance is proposed and empirically tested. The empirical data were obtained from a survey of 133 Tunisian companies from the plastic transforming sector. Findings - The results reveal a positive relationship between quality management practices and organizational performance. Moreover, the findings show a significant relationship between management and infrastructure practices. In addition, the results illustrate a direct effect of infrastructure practices on operational performance and of core practices on product quality. Research limitations/implications - The conceptual model proposed and tested in this study can be used by researchers for developing quality management theory. In addition, this model may offer a flow chart to practitioners for effective quality management implementation. Originality/value - The proposed model is the first one to distinguish the direct effects of infrastructure practices on performance from the indirect effects of these practices through the core practices. Besides, the use of path analysis method to study the direct and indirect relationships between quality management practices and their effect on performance dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / +
页数:28
相关论文
共 82 条
[71]  
Sila I., 2002, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V19, P902, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710210434801
[72]   Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research [J].
Sousa, R ;
Voss, CA .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2002, 20 (01) :91-109
[73]  
Sun H., 2001, QUALITY MANAGEMENT J, V8, P53, DOI 10.1080/10686967.2001.11918952
[74]  
Sun H., 2000, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V17, P168, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710010304573
[75]   MANUFACTURING STRATEGY, ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AND PERFORMANCE - A PATH ANALYTIC MODEL [J].
SWAMIDASS, PM ;
NEWELL, WT .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (04) :509-524
[76]  
Tamimi N., 1998, INT J QUALITY SCI, V3, P71, DOI [10.1108/13598539810196886, DOI 10.1108/13598539810196886]
[77]  
Terziovski M., 1999, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V16
[78]  
Tornow W.W., 1991, HUM RESO PLANN, V14, P105
[79]   CONSTRUCT MEASUREMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY RESEARCH - A CRITIQUE AND PROPOSAL [J].
VENKATRAMAN, N ;
GRANT, JH .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1986, 11 (01) :71-87
[80]  
Waldman D. A, 1994, ACAD MANAGEMENT REV, V19