ELECTROMAGNETIC CALCULATION OF SOFT-X-RAY DIFFRACTION FROM 0.1-MU-M SCALE GOLD STRUCTURES

被引:23
作者
SCHATTENBURG, ML [1 ]
LI, K [1 ]
SHIN, RT [1 ]
KONG, JA [1 ]
OLSTER, DB [1 ]
SMITH, HI [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, ELECTR RES LAB, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B | 1991年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1116/1.585293
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Because the effects of diffraction during proximity-print x-ray lithography are of critical importance, a number of previous researchers have attempted to calculate the diffraction patterns and minimum achievable feature sizes as a function of wavelength and gap. Work to date has assumed that scalar diffraction theory is applicable-as calculated, e.g., by the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld formulation-and that Kirchhoff boundary conditions (KBC) can be applied. KBC assume that the fields (amplitude and phase) are constant in the open regions between absorbers, and a different constant in regions just under the absorbers (i.e., that there are no fringing fields). An x-ray absorber is, however, best described as a lossy dielectric that is tens or hundreds of wavelengths tall, and hence KBC are unsuitable. In this report we use two numerical techniques to calculate (on a Cray 2 supercomputer) accurate diffracted fields from gold absorbers for two cases: a 30-nm-wide line at lambda = 4.5 nm, and a 100-nm-wide line at lambda = 1.3 nm. We show that the use of KBC introduces unphysically high spatial frequencies into the diffracted fields. The suppression of these frequencies-which occurs naturally without the need to introduce an extended source or broad spectrum-tremendously improves exposure latitude for mask features near 0.1-mu-m and below. In particular, we show that KBC should not be applied to 0.1-mu-m features and wavelengths near 1.3 nm for gaps below 11-mu-m.
引用
收藏
页码:3232 / 3236
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   DIFFRACTION EFFECTS ON PATTERN REPLICATION WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION [J].
ATODA, N ;
KAWAKATSU, H ;
TANINO, H ;
ICHIMURA, S ;
HIRATA, M ;
HOH, K .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1983, 1 (04) :1267-1270
[2]   RESOLUTION LIMITS IN X-RAY-LITHOGRAPHY CALCULATED BY MEANS OF X-RAY-LITHOGRAPHY SIMULATOR XMAS [J].
BETZ, H ;
HEINRICH, K ;
HEUBERGER, A ;
HUBER, H ;
OERTEL, H .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1986, 4 (01) :248-252
[3]  
BORN M, 1980, PRINCIPLES OPTICS, pCH10
[4]  
BORN M, 1980, PRINCIPLES OPTICS, pCH8
[5]  
Goodman J., 2005, INTRO FOURIER OPTICS
[6]   AERIAL IMAGE-FORMATION IN SYNCHROTRON-RADIATION-BASED X-RAY-LITHOGRAPHY - THE WHOLE PICTURE [J].
GUO, JZY ;
CHEN, G ;
WHITE, V ;
ANDERSON, P ;
CERRINA, F .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1990, 8 (06) :1551-1556
[7]  
Harrington R. F., 1968, FIELD COMPUTATION MO
[8]  
HASEGAWA S, 1988, MICROELECTRON ENG, V8, P127
[9]   COMPUTER-SIMULATIONS OF RESIST PROFILES IN X-RAY-LITHOGRAPHY [J].
HEINRICH, K ;
BETZ, H ;
HEUBERGER, A ;
PONGRATZ, S .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 19 (04) :1254-1258
[10]  
Henke B. L., 1982, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/0092-640X(82)90002-X