Methodological reasons for the theory/practice divide in market segmentation

被引:45
作者
Dolnicar, Sara [1 ]
Lazarevski, Katie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Management & Mkt, Mkt Res Innovat Ctr MRIC, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Market segmentation; Methodology; Theory/practice divide;
D O I
10.1362/026725709X429791
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A theory/practice divide exists in market segmentation. The main reasons are the focus of academic studies on statistical techniques, and managers' lack of understanding of fundamental segmentation basics (Dibb 2005; Greenberg and McDonald 1989). To date, only one study has explored methodological reasons for the theory/practice divide: Dibb and Simkin 1994. We extend their work by: (1) detailing key methodological aspects likely to cause difficulties in translating segmentation findings into managerially useful information, and (2) empirically investigating specific research questions about methodologyinduced reasons for the theory/practice divide derived from both theory and the propositions of previous studies. Results indicate a large proportion of managers lack a fundamental understanding of market segmentation methodology, thus over-interpreting the validity of solutions. More than 60% of managers indicated that to them, market segmentation is like a "black box", and they have difficulties interpreting presented segmentation solutions. Practical recommendations for improvement are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 373
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[42]  
WEDEL M, 1998, MARKET SEGMENTATION
[43]   Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items [J].
Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J ;
Billiet, J ;
Cambré, B .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 34 (06) :702-722
[44]  
White P. D., 1992, BANK MARKETING, V24, P3
[45]   ISSUES AND ADVANCES IN SEGMENTATION RESEARCH [J].
WIND, Y .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1978, 15 (03) :317-337