Determining Femoral Component Position Using CAS and Measured Resection

被引:16
作者
Benjamin, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orthoped Specialists, Tucson, AZ 85718 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11999-008-0426-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the ability of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) to accurately size and determine rotational alignment of the femoral component in TKA, the author reviewed femoral component position after 50 consecutive primary TKAs using a femur-first, measured resection workflow. The computer software used allowed femoral rotation to be selected based on epicondylar axis, posterior condylar axis, or anteroposterior axis. The final femoral component size and position was determined by the surgeon to avoid anterior notching, match the posterior-medial condyle resection, and flexed to match the plane of the anterior femoral cortex. Femoral sizing was confirmed intraoperatively with a standard sizing guide. The femoral component was downsized in 52% of patients from the size recommended by the computer software. The posterior condylar axis matched the implanted rotational position of the femoral component to within 1 degrees in 64% of patients in contrast to the epicondylar axis (32%) and anteroposterior axis (26%). CAS provides information to make surgical decisions but does not replace clinical judgment. Landmark referencing may be compromised by limited surgical exposures leading to variation in implant positioning by computer software. A clear understanding of the principles of TKA is critical when using CAS to optimize implant sizing and position.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2750
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
Akagi M, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P155
[2]
Akagi M, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P147
[3]
[Anonymous], 1993, SURG KNEE 2
[4]
ANOUCHI YS, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P170
[5]
FEMORAL ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT, BASED ON THE ANTEROPOSTERIOR AXIS, IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN A VALGUS KNEE - A TECHNICAL NOTE [J].
ARIMA, J ;
WHITESIDE, LA ;
MCCARTHY, DS ;
WHITE, SE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 77 (09) :1331-1334
[6]
Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Berger, RA ;
Crossett, LS ;
Jacobs, JJ ;
Rubash, HE .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (356) :144-153
[7]
BERGER RA, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V286, P40
[8]
Computer-assisted total knee replacement - A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT protocol) [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Clark, GW ;
Lloyd, S ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Sikorski, JM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (06) :818-823
[9]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[10]
Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique [J].
Chin, PL ;
Yang, KY ;
Yeo, SJ ;
Lo, NN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (05) :618-626