A Spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court

被引:35
作者
Lazega, Emmanuel [1 ]
Lemercier, Claire [2 ]
Mounier, Lise [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 09, CERSO, F-75775 Paris 16, France
[2] CNRS, IHMC, Paris, France
[3] CNRS, Ctr Maurice Halbwachs, Paris, France
关键词
formal organization; dynamics; advice network; learning; commercial court; spinning top;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500058
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The longitudinal study of advice networks among 240 judges at the Commercial Court of Paris permits the examination of learning as an interactive process. We argue that a spinning top model is a useful heuristic for intra-organizational learning in dynamic advice networks. This model proposes that a stabilized elite preserves accumulated knowledge in a community that overall experiences high turnover and systematic job rotation, and hence runs the danger of inadequately sharing knowledge among its members. We test the model by analyzing the structure and dynamics of advice networks among judges at the Commercial Court of Paris. This dynamic structure reflects the informal homophilous preferences among judges organized in a strong formal system, a high relational turnover in the selection of advisors, and the emergence of an elite of senior advisors that stabilizes the learning process - much like the behavior of a spinning top. This case study also identifies an endogenous process of increasing and then decreasing centralization of this network over time, raising questions about the maintenance of the stability of the pecking order and about the relationship between learning and seniority. Results illustrate the importance of dynamic over static network analysis and call for a renewed attention to formal structure in organizations. European Management Review (2006) 3, 113-122. doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500058
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]   Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data [J].
Lazega, E ;
vanDuijn, M .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1997, 19 (04) :375-397
[32]  
Lazega E., 1992, MICROPOLITICS KNOWLE
[33]  
Lemercier C., 2003, SI DISCRET POUVOIR O
[34]   ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING [J].
LEVITT, B ;
MARCH, JG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1988, 14 :319-340
[35]  
March J. G., 1958, Organizations, DOI DOI 10.2307/2390654
[36]   Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance [J].
McDonald, ML ;
Westphal, JD .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 48 (01) :1-32
[37]   Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks [J].
McPherson, M ;
Smith-Lovin, L ;
Cook, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 27 :415-444
[38]   Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making [J].
Mizruchi, MS ;
Stearns, LB .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 66 (05) :647-671
[39]   Job rotation as a learning mechanism [J].
Ortega, J .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (10) :1361-1370
[40]  
Poell Rob F., 1998, CONTINUING PROFESSIO, P1