Effects of perceptual modality on verbatim and gist memory

被引:10
作者
Gerkens, DR [1 ]
Smith, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03206474
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
In two experiments, predictions of the fuzzy-trace theory of memory were tested. Perceptual information may play a role in retrieval and recognition processes for verbatim, but not for gist, memory. Perceptual modality effects were assessed in the present study by presenting three-sentence stories (e.g., The bird is in the cage. The cage is over the table. The bird is yellow) and then testing recognition of probes that varied on three dimensions: (1) semantic accuracy (true vs. false), (2) wording (all original words vs. one novel word included), and (3) sentence type (premise vs. inference). In Experiment 1, study modality (auditory vs. visual) was manipulated, and in Experiment 2, both study and test modalities were manipulated. Despite replicating a number of findings consistent with fuzzy-trace theory (e.g., instruction and probe type effects), the results of both experiments failed to support the idea that perceptual information plays a role in performance on verbatim memory tests.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   THE EFFECT OF MODALITY ON LONG-TERM RECOGNITION MEMORY [J].
DEAN, RS ;
YEKOVICH, FR ;
GRAY, JW .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 13 (02) :102-115
[12]   Modality effects in false recall and false recognition [J].
Gallo, DA ;
McDermott, KB ;
Percer, JM ;
Roediger, HL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (02) :339-353
[13]   EFFECTS OF IMAGINING SPEAKERS VOICES ON RETENTION OF WORDS PRESENTED VISUALLY [J].
GEISELMAN, RE ;
GLENNY, J .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1977, 5 (05) :499-504
[14]   PRIMARY VERSUS SECONDARY REHEARSAL IN IMAGINED VOICES - DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON RECOGNITION [J].
GEISELMAN, RE ;
BJORK, RA .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (02) :188-205
[15]   Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory [J].
Goldinger, SD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) :1166-1183
[16]   A DISSOCIATION IN THE EFFECTS OF STUDY MODALITY ON TESTS OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY [J].
HAYMAN, CAG ;
RICKARDS, C .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1995, 23 (01) :95-112
[17]   False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition [J].
Hicks, JL ;
Marsh, RL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (02) :375-383
[18]   MEMORY FOR MODE OF INPUT [J].
HINTZMAN, DL ;
BLOCK, RA ;
INSKEEP, NR .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :741-749
[19]   Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory [J].
Jones, TC ;
Jacoby, LL ;
Gellis, LA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 44 (01) :131-152
[20]   Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory [J].
Kellogg, RT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (04) :913-919