A preliminary evaluation of the Lunar Expert-XL for bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry

被引:39
作者
Lang, T
Takada, M
Gee, R
Wu, C
Li, J
HayashiClark, C
Schoen, S
March, V
Genant, HK
机构
[1] Osteoporosis Research Group, Department of Radiology, Univ. of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
[2] Osteoporosis Research Group, Department of Radiology, Univ. of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-1250
关键词
D O I
10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.136
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We have evaluated the Lunar Expert-XL for standard bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and for morphometric imaging of the spine in the lateral projection, The short-term precision in vitro of the Expert-XL for BMD measurements was 0.7% for the Hologic and European spine phantoms, and the long-term stability (15-month) measurements had a 1.1% coefficient of variation, The precision in vivo for three operators examining a group of 10 premenopausal women was 0.9-15% for lumbar spine (L2-L4), 1.7-2.2% for the femoral neck, and 0.9% for the total hip region of interest, For a group of nine postmenopausal women, the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur precision ranges were 2.0-2.4, 1.2-2.9, and 1.6-1.7% respectively. For L2-L4, BMD comparison between the Expert-XL and DPX-L yielded a correlation coefficient of r = 0.98, a slope of 0.86, and an intercept of 0.139 g/cm(2). The femoral neck results were r = 0.92, slope = 1.00, and intercept = 0.03 g/cm(2), In an evaluation of the Expert-XL for lateral morphometry, we employed a group of 16 postmenopausal women, Comparison of vertebral dimensions between the Expert-XL and radiographic morphometry showed strong agreement (r = 0.97), but the interobserver variability for vertebral height was higher for the Expert-XL than for radiographs (3-5% vs, 1-2%). In a subset of Pour women who had repeat scans, the interscan precision for measuring vertebral dimensions,vas 1.9, 4.1, and 4.3% for the L1-L4, T12-T8, and T7-T5 levels respectively. In the Expert-XL images, it was possible to identify clearly L4-T4 in 10 of 16 patients and L4-T6 in 15 of 16, indicating potential utility for vertebral fracture prescreening.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
CLEEK T, 1993, CALCIFIED TISSUE INT, V52, P154
[2]   DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE SPINE IN ANTEROPOSTERIOR AND LATERAL PROJECTIONS [J].
DUBOEUF, F ;
POMMET, R ;
MEUNIER, PJ ;
DELMAS, PD .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 4 (02) :110-116
[3]  
GENANT HK, 1995, J JPN SOC BONE MORPH, V5, P93
[4]   ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270
[5]   COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHY [J].
GLUER, CC ;
STEIGER, P ;
SELVIDGE, R ;
ELLIESENKLIEFOTH, K ;
HAYASHI, C ;
GENANT, HK .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (01) :223-228
[6]  
HANS D, 1995, 11 INT BON DENS WORK
[7]   CURRENT METHODS AND RECENT ADVANCES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOPOROSIS [J].
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1993, 36 (12) :1649-1662
[8]   PRECISION AND STABILITY OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS [J].
JOHNSON, J ;
DAWSONHUGHES, B .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 49 (03) :174-178
[9]   EFFECTIVE DOSE VALUES IN BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENTS BY PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
KALENDER, WA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 2 (02) :82-87
[10]  
Lu Y, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P626