Fuzzy knowledge-based model for soil condition assessment in Argentinean cropping systems

被引:28
作者
Ferraro, Diego O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Agron, Catedra Cerealicultura,IFEVA, RA-1053 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fuzzy assessment; Sustainability; Knowledge-based systems; Soil indicators; Argentina; RESIDUE DECOMPOSITION; NO-TILLAGE; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; QUALITY INDICATORS; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; USE EFFICIENCY; ROLLING PAMPA; LONG-TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.07.006
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A knowledge-based system (KBS) for assessing soil condition in agroecosystems is presented. The KBS Was built through expert opinion elicitation and available scientific data using fuzzy logic. The system is structured into three main elements: (1) input variables that represent the physical domain of soil condition assessment and are related to environmental and crop management conditions; (2) primary modules that describe the fuzzy nature of the soil indicators and; (3) secondary modules that represent the elicited knowledge on soil condition assessment from an expert panel. The application of the KBS on data on crop fields from Inland Pampa (Argentina) indicated that soil nitrogen depletion poses a hazard for soil health as no crop was able to accomplish more than 50% of the sustainability criteria elicited for soil nitrogen extraction from the system. Conversely, soil carbon and physical conditions exhibited values closer to the desirable scenarios elicited by the fuzzy if-then rules, with Values of 0.84, 0.71 and 0.74 for maize, soybean and wheat, respectively, where higher indicator values reflect better soil condition assessment. No significant differences were observed in the overall soil degradation module between crops, with values of 0.64 for maize and wheat and 0.67 for soybean. The KBS developed in this work provided an alternative modeling tool for assessing agroecosystem condition when knowledge regarding long-term assessment is imprecise and uncertain. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 370
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
[81]  
United Nations, 1987, Our Common Future, DOI DOI 10.1080/07488008808408783
[82]   Elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel: Formal process and application in animal health [J].
Van der Fels-Klerx, IHJ ;
Goossens, LHJ ;
Saatkamp, HW ;
Horst, SHS .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (01) :67-81
[83]   An indicator of pesticide environmental impact based on a fuzzy expert system [J].
van der Werf, HMG ;
Zimmer, C .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1998, 36 (10) :2225-2249
[84]   Environmental assessment of agriculture at a regional scale in the Pampas of Argentina [J].
Viglizzo, EF ;
Pordomingo, AJ ;
Castro, MG ;
Lertora, FA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 87 (02) :169-195
[85]   Sustainability in agriculture -: an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice [J].
von Wirén-Lehr, S .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 84 (02) :115-129
[86]  
Winkler R.L., 2004, Decision Analysis, V1, P167, DOI [10.1287/deca.1030.0008, DOI 10.1287/DECA.1030.0008]
[87]  
Wischmeier W. H., 1978, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook
[88]   Eliciting and integrating expert knowledge for wildlife habitat modelling [J].
Yamada, K ;
Elith, J ;
McCarthy, M ;
Zerger, A .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 165 (2-3) :251-264
[89]  
YAMAN B, 1996, SYST DYNAM REV, V12, P183
[90]   Evaluating agri-environmental indicators (AEIs) -: Use and limitations of international indicators at national level [J].
Yli-Viikari, Anja ;
Hietala-Koivu, Reija ;
Huusela-Veistola, Erja ;
Hyvonen, Terho ;
Perala, Paula ;
Turtola, Eila .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (01) :150-163