Single-Arc IMRT?

被引:153
作者
Bortfeld, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Webb, Steve [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC; PLAN QUALITY; THERAPY; DELIVERY; COMPENSATION; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique at a conceptual level. We consider the original theoretical example case from Brahme et al that got the field of IMRT started. Using analytical methods, we derive deliverable intensity 'landscapes' for Single-Arc as well as standard IMRT and Tomotherapy. We find that Tomotherapy provides the greatest flexibility in shaping intensity landscapes and that it allows one to deliver IMRT in a way that comes close to the ideal case in the transverse plane. Single-Arc and standard IMRT make compromises in different areas. Only in relatively simple cases that do not require substantial intensity modulation will Single-Arc be dosimetrically comparable to Tomotherapy. Compared with standard IMRT, Single-Arc could be dosimetrically superior in certain cases if one is willing to accept the spreading of low dose values over large volumes of normal tissue. In terms of treatment planning, Single-Arc poses a more challenging optimization problem than Tomotherapy or standard IMRT. We conclude that Single-Arc holds potential as an efficient IMRT technique especially for relatively simple cases. In very complex cases, Single-Arc may unduly compromise the quality of the dose distribution, if one tries to keep the treatment time below 2 min or so. As with all IMRT techniques, it is important to explore the tradeoff between plan quality and the efficiency of its delivery carefully for each individual case.
引用
收藏
页码:N9 / N20
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   What is the optimum leaf width of a multileaf collimator? [J].
Bortfeld, T ;
Oelfke, U ;
Nill, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (11) :2494-2502
[2]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[3]  
BOYER A, 2001, S HON M GOIT BOST OC
[4]   SOLUTION OF AN INTEGRAL-EQUATION ENCOUNTERED IN ROTATION THERAPY [J].
BRAHME, A ;
ROOS, JE ;
LAX, I .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1982, 27 (10) :1221-1229
[5]   Treatment planning for conformal proton radiation therapy [J].
Bussière, MR ;
Adams, JA .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (05) :389-399
[6]   Sweeping-window arc therapy: an implementation of rotational IMRT with automatic beam-weight calculation [J].
Cameron, C .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (18) :4317-4336
[7]   Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy [J].
Cao, Daliang ;
Holmes, Timothy W. ;
Afghan, Muhammad K. N. ;
Shepard, David M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (01) :240-250
[8]  
CORMACK AM, 1987, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V13, P630
[9]   Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning [J].
Coselmon, MM ;
Moran, JM ;
Radawski, JD ;
Fraass, BA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (05) :1234-1245
[10]   A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy [J].
Cozzi, Luca ;
Dinshaw, Ketayun Ardeshir ;
Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore ;
Mahantshetty, Umesh ;
Engineer, Reena ;
Deshpande, Deepak Dattatray ;
Jamema, S. V. ;
Vanetti, Eugenio ;
Clivio, Alessandro ;
Nicolini, Giorgia ;
Fogliata, Antonella .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (02) :180-191