Investigation of gate to contact spacing effect on ESD robustness of salicided deep submicron single finger NMOS transistors

被引:10
作者
Oh, KH [1 ]
Duvvury, C
Banerjee, K
Dutton, RW
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Integrated Syst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Texas Instruments Inc, Silicon Technol Dev, Dallas, TX 75243 USA
来源
40TH ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS: INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM | 2002年
关键词
gate-to-contact spacing; ballast resistance; power dissipating volume; ESD robustness; salicided NMOS transistor;
D O I
10.1109/RELPHY.2002.996628
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
ESD failure threshold of NMOS transistors is known to degrade with the use of silicided diffusions owing to insufficient ballast resistance, making them susceptible to current localization, which leads to early ESD failure. It is commonly believed that the gate-to-contact spacing of silicided devices has no impact on the ESD strength. However, experimental results presented in this paper show that the ESD strength depends on the gate-to-contact spacing independent of the silicided process. This paper also presents results of a detailed investigation of the influence of gate-to-source and gate-to-drain contact spacings for a salicided 0.13 mum technology and provides new insight into the behavior of ESD protection devices. It is shown that the reduction in current localization and increase in the power dissipating volume with increase in the gate-to-contact spacings are root causes of this improvement, which implies that even for silicided processes, the gate-to-contact spacing should be carefully considered for efficient and robust ESD protection designs.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 155
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Correlating drain junction scaling, salicide thickness, and lateral NPN behavior, with the ESD/EOS performance of a 0.25 mu m CMOS process. [J].
Amerasekera, A ;
McNeil, V ;
Redder, M .
IEDM - INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING, TECHNICAL DIGEST 1996, 1996, :893-896
[2]   ESD FAILURE MODES - CHARACTERISTICS, MECHANISMS, AND PROCESS INFLUENCES [J].
AMERASEKERA, A ;
VANDENABEELEN, W ;
VANROOZENDAAL, L ;
HANNEMANN, M ;
SCHOFIELD, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1992, 39 (02) :430-436
[3]  
AMERASEKERA A, 1999, IRPS, P159
[4]  
Amerasekera A., 1995, ESD SILICON INTEGRAT
[5]  
AMERASEKERA A, 1996, IRPS P, P318
[6]   Substrate pump NMOS for ESD protection applications [J].
Duvvury, C ;
Ratnaswamy, S ;
Amerasekera, A ;
Cline, RA ;
Andresen, BH ;
Gupta, V .
ELECTRICAL OVERSTRESS/ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 2000, :7-17
[7]  
NOTERMANS G, 1999, IRPS, P154
[8]   Non-uniform bipolar conduction in single finger NMOS transistors and implications for deep submicron ESD design [J].
Oh, KH ;
Duvvury, C ;
Salling, C ;
Banerjee, K ;
Dutton, RW .
39TH ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS: INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM 2001, 2001, :226-234
[9]  
SZE SM, 1981, PHYSICS SEMICONDUCTO
[10]   Wafer cost reduction through design of high performance fully silicided ESD devices [J].
Verhaege, KG ;
Russ, CC .
ELECTRICAL OVERSTRESS/ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 2000, :18-28