In the past few years, copper has been widely used as interconnect metallization for advanced ultralarge-scale integration (ULSI) circuits. Due to the unique chemical properties of copper compared to its predecessor, aluminum, different integration processes must be used for circuit fabrication, that is, the damascene versus reactive ion etch (RIE) process. This difference in integration processes introduces a series of reliability concerns for copper interconnects. After a brief comparison of copper and aluminum interconnects, this article discusses the impact of the differences in the material properties and integration process on reliability. Details are provided on two advanced metallization reliability failure mechanisms: electromigration and stress migration. For copper interconnects, the interface between the cap and the copper metal serves as the fast diffusion path. To improve copper interconnect reliability, development efforts have focused on suppressing copper or copper vacancy diffusion along the interface. Two copper interfaces, the copper/cap interface and the copper/liner (or diffusion barrier) interface, are critical for copper reliability. For commonly used liners, such as Ta/TaN, the copper/liner interface is relatively easy to control compared to the copper/cap interface. For dual-damascene copper lines, a copper via is used to connect the lower level to the upper level. Unlike the robust tungsten stud used in aluminum interconnects, the copper via has been identified as a weak link in dual-damascene copper connections; the majority of early reliability failures can be attributed to the copper vias. The three most critical process factors and elements affecting copper interconnect reliability are copper vias and interfaces and the liner coverage. Using a low-k dielectric with a copper interconnect introduces several new challenges to reliability, including dielectric breakdown, temperature cycle, and stability within packages. Extensive knowledge is urgently needed to understand these issues. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.