Continuous intensity map optimization (CIMO): A novel approach to leaf sequencing in step and shoot IMRT

被引:12
作者
Cao, DL
Earl, MA
Luan, S
Shepard, DM
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Comp Sci, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Radiol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2176057
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A new leaf-sequencing approach has been developed that is designed to reduce the number of required beam segments for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This approach to leaf sequencing is called continuous-intensity-map-optimization (CIMO). Using a simulated annealing algorithm, CIMO seeks to minimize differences between the optimized and sequenced intensity maps. Two distinguishing features of the CIMO algorithm are (L) CIMO does not require that each optimized intensity map be clustered into discrete levels and (2) CIMO is not rule-based but rather simultaneously optimizes both the aperture shapes and weights. To test the CIMO algorithm, ten IMRT patient cases were selected (four head-and-neck, two pancreas, two prostate, one brain, and one pelvis). For each case, the optimized intensity maps were extracted from the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system. The CIMO algorithm was applied, and the optimized aperture shapes and weights were loaded back into Pinnacle. A final dose calculation was performed using Pinnacle's convolution/superposition based dose calculation. On average, the CIMO algorithm provided a 54% reduction in the number of beam segments as compared with Pinnacle's leaf sequencer. The plans sequenced using the CIMO algorithm also provided improved target dose uniformity and a reduced discrepancy between the optimized and sequenced intensity maps. For ten clinical intensity maps, comparisons were performed between the CIMO algorithm and the power-of-two reduction algorithm of Xia and Verhey (Med. Phys. 25(8), 1424-1434 (1998)]. When the constraints of a Varian Millennium multi-leaf collimator were applied, the CIMO algorithm resulted in a 26% reduction in the number of segments. For an Elekta multileaf collimator, the CIMO algorithm resulted in a 67% reduction in the number of segments. An average leaf sequencing time of less than one minute per beam was observed. (c) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 867
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Modifications to the IMFAST leaf sequencing optimization algorithm [J].
Alfredo, R ;
Siochi, C .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (12) :3267-3278
[2]   A variable fluence step clustering and segmentation algorithm for step and shoot IMRT [J].
Bär, W ;
Alber, M ;
Nüsslin, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (07) :1997-2007
[3]   Minimizing beam-on time in cancer radiation treatment using multileaf collimators [J].
Boland, N ;
Hamacher, HW ;
Lenzen, F .
NETWORKS, 2004, 43 (04) :226-240
[4]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[5]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Yu, CX .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :48-59
[6]   A graph-searching method for MLC leaf sequencing under constraints [J].
Chen, Y ;
Hou, Q ;
Galvin, JM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) :1504-1511
[7]  
CONTRUTZ C, 2003, PHYS MED BIOL, V48, P2987
[8]   Minimizing delivery time and monitor units in static IMRT by leaf-sequencing [J].
Crooks, SM ;
McAven, LF ;
Robinson, DF ;
Xing, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (17) :3105-3116
[9]   The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions [J].
Deng, J ;
Pawlicki, T ;
Chen, Y ;
Li, JS ;
Jiang, SB ;
Ma, CM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (04) :1039-1060
[10]   THE DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR [J].
JORDAN, TJ ;
WILLIAMS, PC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (02) :231-251