Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water

被引:113
作者
Fogliata, A [1 ]
Nicolini, G
Vanetti, E
Clivio, A
Cozzi, L
机构
[1] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[2] Univ Milan, Med Phys Specialisat Sch, Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/004
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In July 2005 a new algorithm was released by Varian Medical Systems for the Eclipse planning system and installed in our institute. It is the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) for photon dose calculations, a convolution/superposition model for the first time implemented in a Varian planning system. It was therefore necessary to perform validation studies at different levels with a wide investigation approach. To validate the basic performances of the AAA, a detailed analysis of data computed by the AAA configuration algorithm was carried out and data were compared against measurements. To better appraise the performance of AAA and the capability of its configuration to tailor machine-specific characteristics, data obtained from the pencil beam convolution (PBC) algorithm implemented in Eclipse were also added in the comparison. Since the purpose of the paper is to address the basic performances of the AAA and of its configuration procedures, only data relative to measurements in water will be reported. Validation was carried out for three beams: 6 MV and 15 MV from a Clinac 2100C/D and 6 MV from a Clinac 6EX. Generally AAA calculations reproduced very well measured data, and small deviations were observed, on average, for all the quantities investigated for open and wedged fields. In particular, percentage depth-dose curves showed on average differences between calculation and measurement smaller than 1% or 1 mm, and computed profiles in the flattened region matched measurements with deviations smaller than 1% for all beams, field sizes, depths and wedges. Percentage differences in output factors were observed as small as 1% on average (with a range smaller than +/- 2%) for all conditions. Additional tests were carried out for enhanced dynamic wedges with results comparable to previous results. The basic dosimetric validation of the AAA was therefore considered satisfactory.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1438
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   Dosimetric verification of two commercially available three-dimensional treatment planning systems using the TG 23 test package [J].
Ramsey, CR ;
Cordrey, IL ;
Spencer, KM ;
Oliver, AL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1188-1195
[12]  
SHAW J, 1994, 68 I PHYS ENG MED BI
[13]   The inverse problem of a Gaussian convolution and its application to the finite size of the measurement chambers/detectors in photon and proton dosimetry [J].
Ulmer, W ;
Kaissl, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (06) :707-727
[14]  
Ulmer W., 1995, Medical Physics, V5, P25
[15]  
ULMER W, 1996, Z MED PHYS, V6, P68074
[16]  
VANDYK J, 1993, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V26, P261, DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90206-B
[17]   Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the photon dose calculation performance of treatment planning systems used in a clinical setting [J].
Venselaar, J ;
Welleweerd, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (02) :203-213
[18]   Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems [J].
Venselaar, J ;
Welleweerd, H ;
Mijnheer, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (02) :191-201