Evaluation of intrafraction patient movement for CNS and head & neck IMRT

被引:42
作者
Kim, S [1 ]
Akpati, HC
Kielbasa, JE
Li, JG
Liu, CR
Amdur, RJ
Palta, JR
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Phys, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
intensity-modulated radiation therapy; immobilization; intrafraction movement; uncertainty time histogram;
D O I
10.1118/1.1644641
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Intrafraction patient motion is much more likely in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) than in conventional radiotherapy primarily due to longer beam delivery times in IMRT treatment. In this study, we evaluated the uncertainty of intrafraction patient displacement in CNS and head and neck IMRT patients. Immobilization is performed in three steps: (1) the patient is immobilized with thermoplastic facemask, (2) the patient displacement is monitored using a commercial stereotactic infrared IR camera (ExacTrac, BrainLab) during treatment, and (3) repositioning is carried out as needed. The displacement data were recorded during beam-on time for the entire treatment duration for 5 patients using the camera system. We used the concept of cumulative time versus patient position uncertainty, referred to as an uncertainty time histogram (UTH), to analyze the data. UTH is a plot of the accumulated time during which a patient stays within the corresponding movement uncertainty. The University of Florida immobilization procedure showed an effective immobilization capability for CNS and head and neck IMRT patients by keeping the patient displacement less than 1.5 mm for 95% of treatment time (1.43 mm for 1, and 1.02 mm for 1, and less than 1.0 mm for 3 patients). The maximum displacement was 2.0 mm. (C) 2004 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ICRU Report 50
[3]   Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: How much margin is needed? [J].
Antolak, JA ;
Rosen, II .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1165-1170
[4]  
BENEDICT SH, 1999, NEW POSITIONING TECH
[5]   Comparison of two dead and neck immobilization systems [J].
Bentel, GC ;
Marks, LB ;
Hendren, K ;
Brizel, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (04) :867-873
[6]  
BOONE RA, 1999, NEW POSITIONING TECH
[7]   Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation [J].
Bortfeld, T ;
Jokivarsi, K ;
Goitein, M ;
Kung, J ;
Jiang, SB .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (13) :2203-2220
[8]   The university of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system [J].
Bova, FJ ;
Buatti, JM ;
Friedman, WA ;
Mendenhall, WM ;
Yang, CC ;
Liu, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (04) :875-882
[9]   Preliminary experience with frameless stereotactic radiotherapy [J].
Buatti, JM ;
Bova, FJ ;
Friedman, WA ;
Meeks, SL ;
Marcus, RB ;
Mickle, JP ;
Ellis, TL ;
Mendenhall, WM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03) :591-599
[10]   Initial clinical experience with a video-based patient positioning system [J].
Johnson, LS ;
Milliken, BD ;
Hadley, SW ;
Pelizzari, CA ;
Haraf, DJ ;
Chen, GTY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (01) :205-213