Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom:: Detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector

被引:49
作者
Strotzer, M [1 ]
Völk, M [1 ]
Wild, T [1 ]
von Landenberg, P [1 ]
Feuerbach, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
bones; radiology; flat panel detector; radiography; comparative studies; digital; technology; screens and films;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma03512
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of an active-matrix flat-panel x-ray detector for reduced-dose imaging of simulated arthritic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A digital x-ray detector based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon technology with a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, matrix of 3,000 x 3,000 pixels, pixel size of 143 mu m, and digital output of 14 bits was used. State-of-the-art screen-film radiographs were compared with digital images obtained at doses equivalent to those obtained with system speeds of 400, 560, and 800. The phantom was composed of a human hand skeleton on an acrylic plate with drilled holes simulating bone erosions of different diameters and depths. Results of four independent observers were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector resulted in better diagnostic performance than did the screen-film combination, with the dose being the same for both modalities (P < .05). For digital images obtained at reduced doses, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: The improved diagnostic performance with digital radiographs obtained with the cesium iodide and amorphous silicon detector suggests that this detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction for specific diagnostic tasks, without loss of diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 515
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
GROTE R, 1992, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V156, P264
[2]   The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents - Measures of screen-film performance [J].
Haus, AG .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1996, 16 (05) :1165-1181
[3]   ARTIFICIAL BONE EROSIONS - DETECTION WITH MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL HIGH-RESOLUTION RADIOGRAPHY [J].
LINK, TM ;
RUMMENY, EJ ;
LENZEN, H ;
REUTER, I ;
ROOS, N ;
PETERS, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (03) :861-864
[4]  
METZ CE, 1986, INVEST RADIOL, V21, P720, DOI 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009
[5]   Clinical application of a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology:: Image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography [J].
Strotzer, M ;
Gmeinwieser, J ;
Völk, M ;
Fründ, R ;
Seitz, J ;
Manke, C ;
Albrich, H ;
Feuerbach, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :23-27
[6]   Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose -: Comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon [J].
Strotzer, M ;
Gmeinwieser, JK ;
Völk, M ;
Fründ, R ;
Seitz, J ;
Feuerbach, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (02) :98-103
[7]   Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography -: Effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures [J].
Strotzer, M ;
Gmeinwieser, J ;
Spahn, M ;
Völk, M ;
Fründ, R ;
Seitz, J ;
Spies, V ;
Alexander, J ;
Feuerbach, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (01) :33-38
[8]   Flat-panel X-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology - Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies [J].
Volk, M ;
Strotzer, M ;
Gmeinwieser, J ;
Alexander, J ;
Frund, R ;
Seitz, J ;
Manke, C ;
Spahn, M ;
Feuerbach, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1997, 32 (07) :373-377