Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography -: Effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures

被引:50
作者
Strotzer, M
Gmeinwieser, J
Spahn, M
Völk, M
Fründ, R
Seitz, J
Spies, V
Alexander, J
Feuerbach, S
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Siemens AG, Med Engn, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
radiography; digital; amorphous silicon; receiver operating characteristic curve;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199801000-00005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this phantom study was to assess the diagnostic performance of a self-scanning, solid-state amorphous silicon (a-Si) detector in skeletal radiography using different exposure parameters. METHODS. A flat-panel detector (15 cm x 15 cm), based on a-Si technology with 143 mu m x 143 mu m pixel size, Ik x Ik matrix, and 12 bit digital output was used, State-of-the-art screen-film radiography (SFR; speed 400, detector dose 2.5 mu Gy) was compared with a-Si images taken at doses that were equivalent to a speed of 400, 800, 1,250, and 1,600, respectively, A total of 232 segments of long tubular deer-bones (femur, tibia, humerus, radius) had 110 artificial fractures and 112 cortical defects simulating osteolytic lesions, Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for 9,280 observations made by four independent observers, Two-tailed Student's paired t test was used for statistical analysis (95% confidence level). RESULTS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded equivalent results of the a-Si and SFR system, Even at the lowest dose there were no statistically significant differences between both imaging modalities with respect to the detectability of fractures and cortical defects. CONCLUSIONS. The results of this study indicate that a-Si detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction in skeletal radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   A REAL-TIME, FLAT-PANEL, AMORPHOUS-SILICON, DIGITAL X-RAY IMAGER [J].
ANTONUK, LE ;
YORKSTON, J ;
HUANG, WD ;
SIEWERDSEN, JH ;
BOUDRY, JM ;
ELMOHRI, Y ;
MARX, MV .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1995, 15 (04) :993-1000
[2]   DIGITAL SKELETAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
BUCKWALTER, KA ;
BRAUNSTEIN, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (05) :1071-1080
[3]   The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents - Measures of screen-film performance [J].
Haus, AG .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1996, 16 (05) :1165-1181
[4]  
Jonsson A, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P555
[5]  
METZ CE, 1986, INVEST RADIOL, V21, P720, DOI 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009
[6]   NONDISPLACED FRACTURES - SPATIAL-RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS FOR DETECTION WITH DIGITAL SKELETAL IMAGING [J].
MURPHEY, MD ;
BRAMBLE, JM ;
COOK, LT ;
MARTIN, NL ;
DWYER, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :865-870
[8]   COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY IN MUSCULOSKELETAL IMAGING - STATE-OF-THE-ART [J].
MURPHEY, MD ;
QUALE, JL ;
MARTIN, NL ;
BRAMBLE, JM ;
COOK, LT ;
DWYER, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (01) :19-27
[9]   STORAGE PHOSPHOR VERSUS SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY - EFFECT OF VARYING EXPOSURE PARAMETERS AND UNSHARP MASK FILTERING ON THE DETECTABILITY OF CORTICAL BONE DEFECTS [J].
PROKOP, M ;
GALANSKI, M ;
OESTMANN, JW ;
VONFALKENHAUSEN, U ;
ROSENTHAL, H ;
REIMER, P ;
NISCHELSKY, J ;
REICHELT, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (01) :109-113
[10]   DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF DIGITIZED IMAGES VS PLAIN FILMS - A STUDY OF THE JOINTS OF THE FINGERS [J].
RICHMOND, BJ ;
POWERS, C ;
PIRAINO, DW ;
FREED, H ;
MEZIANE, MA ;
HALE, JC ;
SCHLUCHTER, MD ;
SCHILS, J ;
GRAGG, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (02) :437-441