Combined low-volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution: A prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy

被引:43
作者
Hookey, LC [1 ]
Depew, WT [1 ]
Vanner, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2006年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
colonoscopy; preparation; tolerance; volume;
D O I
10.1155/2006/621367
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of polyethylene glycol solutions (PEG) for colon cleansing is often limited by the inability of patients to drink adequate portions of the 4 L Solution. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a reduced volume of PEG combined With stimulant laxatives would be better tolerated and as or more effective than the standard dose. METHODS: Patients Undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either low-volume PEG plus sennosides (120 mg Oral sennosides syrup followed by 2 L PEG) or the standard volume preparation (4 L PEG). The subjects rated the tolerability of the preparations and their symptoms. Colonoscopists were blind to the colonic cleansing preparation and graded the cleansing efficacy using a validated tool (the Ottawa scale). RESULTS: The low-volume PEG plus sennosides preparation was significantly better tolerated than the standard large volume PEG ( P < 0.001) but Was less efficacious (P=0.03). Thirty-eight per cent of patients in the large volume PEG group were unable to finish the preparation, compared with only 6% in the reduced volume group. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the low-volume! PEG plus sennosides preparation was better tolerated, it was not as effective as standard large-volume PEG. However, in view Of the significant difference in tolerance, further research investigating possible improvements in the reduced-volume regimen seems warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 105
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ADAMS WJ, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF02048160
[2]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
AFRIDI, SA ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) :485-489
[3]   Prospective randomized trial comparing bowel cleaning preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Arezzo, A .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2000, 10 (04) :215-217
[4]   A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[5]   Carbohydrate-electrolyte rehydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate [J].
Barclay, RL ;
Depew, WT ;
Vanner, SJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (05) :633-638
[6]   EFFECTIVENESS AND ACCEPTABILITY OF 3 BOWEL CLEANSING REGIMENS [J].
BORKJE, B ;
PEDERSEN, R ;
LUND, GM ;
ENEHAUG, JS ;
BERSTAD, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 26 (02) :162-166
[7]   Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: Pitfalls and complications [J].
Chan, A ;
Depew, W ;
Vanner, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) :334-338
[8]  
Chia Y W, 1995, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V40, P374
[9]   Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison [J].
Clarkston, WK ;
Tsen, TN ;
Dies, DF ;
Schratz, CL ;
Vaswani, SK ;
Bjerregaard, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) :42-48
[10]   THE USE OF GOLYTELY AND DULCOLAX IN COMBINATION IN OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY [J].
CLARKSTON, WK ;
SMITH, OJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 17 (02) :146-148