Errors and margins in radiotherapy

被引:1318
作者
van Herk, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Clinical radiotherapy procedures aim at high accuracy. However, there are many error sources that act during treatment preparation and execution that limit the accuracy. As a consequence, a safety margin is required to ensure that the planned dose is actually delivered to the target for (almost) all patients. Before treatment planning, a planning computed tomography scan is made. In particular, motion of skin with respect to the internal anatomy limits the reproducibility of this step, introducing a systematic setup error. The second important error source is organ motion. The tumor is imaged in an arbitrary position, leading to a systematic organ motion error. The image may also be distorted because of the interference of the scanning process and organ motion. A further systematic error introduced during treatment planning is caused by the delineation process. During treatment, the most important errors are setup error and organ motion leading to day-to-day variations. There are many ways to define the margins required for these errors. In this article, an overview is given of errors in radiotherapy and margin recipes, based on physical and biological considerations. Respiration motion is treated separately. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 64
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Specification of dose delivery in radiation therapy - Recommendations by the Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (NACP) [J].
Aaltonen, P ;
Brahme, A ;
Lax, I ;
Levernes, S ;
Naslund, I ;
Reitan, JB ;
Turesson, I .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1997, 36 :1-32
[2]   The required number of treatment imaging days for an effective off-line correction of systematic errors in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer - a radiobiological analysis [J].
Amer, AM ;
Mackay, RI ;
Roberts, SA ;
Hendry, JH ;
Williams, PC .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (02) :143-150
[3]   Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: How much margin is needed? [J].
Antolak, JA ;
Rosen, II .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1165-1170
[4]   Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy [J].
Antolak, JA ;
Rosen, II ;
Childress, CH ;
Zagars, GK ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03) :661-672
[5]   Target volume definition for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of lung cancer [J].
Armstrong, JG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :587-594
[6]   Three dimensional planning target volumes: A model and a software tool [J].
AustinSeymour, M ;
Kalet, I ;
McDonald, J ;
KromhoutSchiro, S ;
Jacky, J ;
Hummel, S ;
Unger, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05) :1073-1080
[7]   Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing [J].
Balter, JM ;
TenHaken, RK ;
Lawrence, TS ;
Lam, KL ;
Robertson, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (01) :167-174
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE MOVEMENT OVER THE COURSE OF ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY USING IMPLANTED MARKERS [J].
BALTER, JM ;
SANDLER, HM ;
LAM, K ;
BREE, RL ;
LICHTER, AS ;
TENHAKEN, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01) :113-118
[9]   Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: Implications for treatment planning [J].
Beard, CJ ;
Kijewski, P ;
Bussiere, M ;
Gelman, R ;
Gladstone, D ;
Shaffer, K ;
Plunkett, M ;
Costello, P ;
Coleman, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (02) :451-458
[10]   Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy [J].
Bel, A ;
vanHerk, M ;
Lebesque, JV .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (09) :1537-1545