Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients

被引:103
作者
Kefer, J
Coche, E
Legros, G
Pasquet, A
Grandin, C
Van Beers, BE
Vanoverschelde, JL
Gerber, BL
机构
[1] Clin Univ St Luc, Dept Cardiol, UCL, Div Cardiol, B-1200 Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
[2] Clin Univ St Luc, Div Radiol, UCL, B-1200 Woluwe St Lambert, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this research was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) versus quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for the detection of coronary artery stenosis in patients. BACKGROUND Both MR and MDCT are novel non-invasive tests, which have been proposed for noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Yet their diagnostic accuracy has not been directly compared in the same population. METHODS Fifty-two patients underwent coronary MR and 16-slice MDCT before invasive coronary angiography. Diameter stenosis (DS) severity. in vessels > 1.5-mm reference diameter were. graded visually and measured quantitatively on both MR and MDCT images. Diagnostic accuracy of both methods was compared using QCA as the reference test. RESULTS According to QCA, 81 of 452 (18%) coronary segments with > 1.5 mm diameter had > 50% DS. By visual analysis, MR and MDCT had similar sensitivity (75% vs. 82%, p = NS), specificity (77% vs. 79%, p = NS), and diagnostic accuracy (77%, vs. 80%, p = NS) for detection of > 50 % DS. Quantitative measures of DS by MR (r = 0.60, p < 0.001) and MDCT (r = 0.75, both p < 0.001) correlated well with QCA. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that quantification of DS severity improved the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT (area under curve [AUC] 0.81 vs. 0.92, p < 0.001) but not that of MR (AUC 0.78 vs. 0.83, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS Visual assessment of coronary diameter stenosis severity by MR or MDCT allows identification of significant coronary artery disease with a similar high diagnostic accuracy. Quantitative analysis significantly further improves the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT but not that of MR. (J Am Coll Cardiol.2005;46:92-100) (c) 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 100
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Achenbach S, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P2535
  • [2] Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography
    Budoff, MJ
    Achenbach, S
    Duerinckx, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (11) : 1867 - 1878
  • [3] Soap-bubble visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms
    Etienne, A
    Botnar, RM
    van Muiswinkel, AMC
    Boesiger, P
    Manning, WJ
    Stuber, M
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 48 (04) : 658 - 666
  • [5] Coronary artery stenosis: Direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection-initial results
    Gerber, BL
    Coche, E
    Pasquet, A
    Ketelslegers, E
    Vancraeynest, D
    Grandin, C
    Van Beers, BE
    Vanoverschelde, JLJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (01) : 98 - 108
  • [6] Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses
    Kim, WY
    Danias, PG
    Stuber, M
    Flamm, SD
    Plein, S
    Nagel, E
    Langerak, SE
    Weber, OM
    Pedersen, EM
    Schmidt, M
    Botnar, RM
    Manning, WJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (26) : 1863 - 1869
  • [7] Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography - Results in 102 patients
    Kopp, AF
    Schroeder, S
    Kuettner, A
    Baumbach, A
    Georg, C
    Kuzo, R
    Heuschmid, M
    Ohnesorge, B
    Karsch, KR
    Claussen, CD
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (21) : 1714 - 1725
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in with angiographically proven coronary artery disease patients
    Kuettner, A
    Kopp, AF
    Schroeder, S
    Rieger, T
    Brunn, J
    Meisner, C
    Heuschmid, M
    Trabold, T
    Burgstahler, C
    Martensen, J
    Schoebel, W
    Selbmann, HK
    Claussen, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 831 - 839
  • [9] Coronary MR angiography: Comparison of quantitative and qualitative data from four techniques
    Maintz, D
    Aepfelbacher, FC
    Kissinger, KV
    Botnar, RM
    Danias, PG
    Heindel, W
    Manning, WJ
    Stuber, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (02) : 515 - 521
  • [10] Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography
    Maruyama, T
    Yoshizumi, T
    Tamura, R
    Takashima, S
    Toyoshima, H
    Konishi, I
    Yamashita, S
    Yamasaki, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (05) : 537 - 542