Direct detection of Legionella species from bronchoalveolar lavage and open lung biopsy specimens:: Comparison of LightCycler PCR, in situ hybridization, direct fluorescence antigen detection, and culture

被引:94
作者
Hayden, RT [1 ]
Uhl, JR [1 ]
Qian, X [1 ]
Hopkins, MK [1 ]
Aubry, MC [1 ]
Limper, AH [1 ]
LLoyd, RV [1 ]
Cockerill, FR [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Div Clin Microbiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.39.7.2618-2626.2001
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We developed a rapid thermocycling, real-time detection (also known as real-time PCR) method for the detection of Legionella species directly from clinical specimens. This method uses the LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind,) and requires approximately 1 to 2 h to perform. Both a Legionella genus PCR assay and Legionella pneumophila species-specific PCR assay were designed. A total of 43 archived specimens from 35 patients were evaluated, including 19 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens and 24 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded open lung biopsy specimens. Twenty-five of the specimens were culture-positive for Legionella (9 BAL, specimens and 16 tissue specimens). BAL specimens were tested by LightCycler PCR (LC-PCR) methods and by a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay, which detects L, pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6 and several other Legionella species. Tissue sections were tested by the two LC-PCR methods, by: DFA, by an in situ hybridization (ISH) assay, specifically designed to detect L,, pneumophila, and by Warthin-Starry (WS) staining. The results were compared to the "gold standard" method of bacterial culture. With BAL specimens the following assays yielded the indicated sensitivities and specificities, respectively: Legionella genus detection by Legionella genus LC-PCR, 100 and 100%; Legionella genus detection by DFA assay, 33 and 100%; and L. pneumophila detection by L, pneumophila species-specific LC-PCR, 100 and 100%. With open lung biopsy specimens the following assays yielded the indicated sensitivities and specificities, respectively: Legionella genus detection by LC-PCR 68.8 and 100%; Legionella genus detection by DFA assay, 44 and 100%; Legionella genus detection by WS staining, 63 and 100%; L. pneumophila species-specific detection by LC-PCR, 17 and 100%; and L. pneumophila species-specific detection by ISH, 100 and 100%. The analytical sensitivity of both LC-PCR assays was < 10 CFU/reaction, LC-PCR is a reliable method for the direct detection of legionella species from BAL specimens, The Legionella genus LC-PCR assay could be performed initially; if positive, L. pneumophila species-specific LC-PCR could then be performed (if species differentiation is desired). The speed with which the LC-PCR procedure can be performed offers significant advantages over both culture-based methods and conventional PCR techniques, In contrast, for the methods evaluated, culture was the. best for detecting multiple Legionella species in lung tissue, WS staining, Legionella genus LC-PCR, and L, pneumophila species-specific ISH were useful as rapid tests with lung tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2626
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   Antigenic lipopolysaccharide components of Legionella pneumophila recognized by monoclonal antibodies: Possibilities and limitations for division of the species into serogroups [J].
Helbig, JH ;
Kurtz, JB ;
Pastoris, MC ;
Pelaz, C ;
Luck, PC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (11) :2841-2845
[22]   DETECTION OF LEGIONELLA SPP IN BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FLUIDS BY DNA AMPLIFICATION [J].
JAULHAC, B ;
NOWICKI, M ;
BORNSTEIN, N ;
MEUNIER, O ;
PREVOST, G ;
PIEMONT, Y ;
FLEURETTE, J ;
MONTEIL, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (04) :920-924
[23]  
Johnson John L., 1994, P683
[24]   ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAY FOR DETECTION OF PCR-AMPLIFIED DNA OF LEGIONELLAE IN BRONCHOALVEOLAR FLUID [J].
JONAS, D ;
ROSENBAUM, A ;
WEYRICH, S ;
BHAKDI, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (05) :1247-1252
[25]   Legionella urinary antigen testing: Potential impact on diagnosis and antibiotic therapy [J].
Kashuba, ADM ;
Ballow, CH .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1996, 24 (03) :129-139
[26]  
Ke DB, 2000, CLIN CHEM, V46, P324
[27]   RAPID DETECTION OF LEGIONELLA SPECIES IN BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FLUIDS WITH THE ENVIROAMP LEGIONELLA PCR AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION KIT [J].
KESSLER, HH ;
REINTHALER, FF ;
PSCHAID, A ;
PIERER, K ;
KLEINHAPPL, B ;
EBER, E ;
MARTH, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (12) :3325-3328
[28]   Relation between the polymerase chain reaction and the indirect fluorescent antibody method in the diagnosis of Legionella infection [J].
Koide, M ;
Saito, A ;
Kusano, N ;
Tateyama, M ;
Inadome, J ;
Kyan, Y ;
Kishaba, T ;
Miyagi, S .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 23 (03) :656-657
[29]   DIAGNOSIS OF LEGIONELLA-PNEUMOPHILA INFECTION BY POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION [J].
KOIDE, M ;
SAITO, A .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 21 (01) :199-201
[30]  
KONEMAN EW, COLOR ATLAS TXB DIAG, P473