Low-dose multidetector-row CT-angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair

被引:22
作者
Iezzi, R. [1 ,2 ]
Cotroneo, A. R. [2 ]
Giammarino, A. [2 ]
Spigonardo, F. [3 ]
Storto, M. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, A Gemelli Hosp, Inst Radiol, Dept Bioimaging & Radiol Sci, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ G DAnnunzio, Sect Radiol, Dept Clin Sci & Bioimaging, Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ G DAnnunzio, Dept Vasc Surg, Chieti, Italy
关键词
CT-angiography; EVAR; Low dose; Abdominal aorta; Endovascular treatment; IMAGE QUALITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; ENHANCEMENT; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.11.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the possibility of reducing radiation dose exposure while maintaining image quality using multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) with high-concentration contrast media in patients undergoing follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm. Materials and methods: In this prospective, single center, intra-individual study, patients underwent two consecutive MDCTA scans 6 months apart, one with a standard acquisition protocol (130 mAs/120 kV) and 120mL of iomeprol 300, and one using a low dose protocol (100 mAs/80 kV) and 90 mL of iomeprol 400. Images acquired during the arterial phase of contrast enhancement were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively for image noise and intraluminal contrast enhancement. Results: Thirty adult patients were prospectively enrolled. Statistically significantly higher attenuation values were measured in the low-dose acquisition protocol compared to the standard protocol, from the suprarenal abdominal aorta to the common femoral artery (p < 0.0001; all vascular segments). Qualitatively, image quality was judged significantly (p = 0.0002) better with the standard protocol than with the low-dose protocol. However, no significant differences were found between the two protocols in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (13.63 +/- 6.97 vs. 11.48 +/- 8.13; p = 0.1058). An overall dose reduction of up to 74% was observed for the low-dose protocol compared with the standard protocol. Conclusion: In repeat follow-up examinations of patients undergoing EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm, a low-dose radiation exposure acquisition protocol provides substantially reduced radiation exposure while maintaining a constant CNR and good image quality. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Amis E Stephen Jr, 2007, J Am Coll Radiol, V4, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.03.002
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, CLIN GUID ID EV TREA
[3]
Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[4]
Mid-term results after endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Bush, RL ;
Lumsden, AB ;
Dodson, TF ;
Salam, AA ;
Weiss, VJ ;
Smith, RB ;
Chaikof, EL .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (02) :S70-S76
[5]
Low-dose ECG-gated 64-slices helical CT angiography of the chest: evaluation of image quality in 105 patients [J].
d'Agostino, A. G. ;
Remy-Jardin, M. ;
Khalil, C. ;
Delannoy-Deken, V. ;
Flohr, T. ;
Duhamel, A. ;
Remy, J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (10) :2137-2146
[6]
*EURO, 1999, 16262 EURO EN, P69
[7]
Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA [J].
Fraioli, F ;
Catalano, C ;
Napoli, A ;
Francone, M ;
Venditti, F ;
Danti, M ;
Pediconi, F ;
Passariello, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (01) :137-146
[8]
Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: Effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT [J].
Hunold, P ;
Vogt, FM ;
Schmermund, A ;
Debatin, JF ;
Kerkhoff, G ;
Budde, T ;
Erbel, R ;
Ewen, K ;
Barkhausen, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) :145-152
[9]
Detection of colorectal lesions: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonograph compared with conventional colonoscopy [J].
Iannaccone, R ;
Laghi, A ;
Catalano, C ;
Brink, JA ;
Mangiapane, F ;
Trenna, S ;
Piacentini, F ;
Passariello, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) :775-781
[10]
Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: Effect on image quality [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Prasad, S ;
Saini, S ;
Blake, MA ;
Varghese, J ;
Halpern, EF ;
Thrall, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) :1101-1106