Comparison of electrical and microtensile evaluations of mechanical properties of an aluminum film

被引:17
作者
Barbosa, N., III [1 ]
Keller, R. R.
Read, D. T.
Geiss, R. H.
Vinci, R. P.
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Lehigh Univ, Dept Math Sci & Engn, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
来源
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE | 2007年 / 38A卷 / 13期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11661-007-9112-y
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We compare two types of tests for measurement of mechanical properties of thin films and small scale structures: a microtensile test and a thermomechanical fatigue test induced by alternating current at low frequency and high current density. The microtensile test was used as a reference for evaluating the feasibility of using the electrical test for measurement of mechanical properties. Tests were performed on structures cofabricated from thin film Al deposited on Si to ensure comparable mechanical properties. The films had a grain diameter of 220 nm and a thickness of 1.9 mu m. The electrical test resulted in an estimated ultimate tensile strength of 230 +/- 40 MPa. This value was based on extrapolation of high-cycle fatigue data to one reversal through a modified Basquin equation while accounting for varying mean stress. An ultimate tensile strength of 239 +/- 4 M Pa was determined from the microtensile test. Differences between these values are explained in terms of the effects of substrate constraint on the strength of the thin film. We conclude that electrical testing methods offer a feasible means for measuring mechanical properties of individual patterned structures.
引用
收藏
页码:2160 / 2167
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Overview no. 130 - Size effects in materials due to microstructural and dimensional constraints: A comparative review [J].
Arzt, E .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 1998, 46 (16) :5611-5626
[2]  
BRANDES EA, 1998, SMITHELLS METALS HDB, P2
[3]  
BROTZEN FR, 1994, INT MATER REV, V39, P24, DOI 10.1179/095066094790150973
[4]   A tensile-testing technique for micrometer-sized free-standing thin films [J].
Cheng, YW ;
Read, DT ;
McColskey, JD ;
Wright, JE .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2005, 484 (1-2) :426-432
[5]   A small area in-situ MEMS test structure to measure fracture strength by electrostatic probing [J].
de Boer, MP ;
Jensen, BD ;
Bitsie, F .
MATERIALS AND DEVICE CHARACTERIZATION IN MICROMACHINING II, 1999, 3875 :97-103
[6]   ELECTRICAL-RESISTIVITY OF ALUMINUM AND MANGANESE [J].
DESAI, PD ;
JAMES, HM ;
HO, CY .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL REFERENCE DATA, 1984, 13 (04) :1131-1172
[7]   A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments [J].
Doerner, M. F. ;
Nix, W. D. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1986, 1 (04) :601-609
[8]   Plastic properties of thin films on substrates as measured by submicron indentation hardness and substrate curvature techniques [J].
Doerner, M. F. ;
Gardner, D. S. ;
Nix, W. D. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1986, 1 (06) :845-851
[9]   Tensile behavior of free-standing gold films. Part I. Coarse-grained films [J].
Emery, RD ;
Povirk, GL .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2003, 51 (07) :2067-2078
[10]   A methodology for determining mechanical properties of freestanding thin films and MEMS materials [J].
Espinosa, HD ;
Prorok, BC ;
Fischer, M .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2003, 51 (01) :47-67