Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition

被引:78
作者
Landry, Guillaume [1 ]
Reniers, Brigitte [1 ]
Murrer, Lars [1 ]
Lutgens, Ludy [1 ]
Bloemen-Van Gurp, Esther [1 ]
Pignol, Jean-Philippe [3 ]
Keller, Brian [3 ]
Beaulieu, Luc [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Verhaegen, Frank [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Dept Radiat Oncol MAASTRO, NL-6201 BN Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, Dept Radio Oncol, CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ G1R 2J6, Canada
[5] Univ Laval, Ctr Rech Cancerol, CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ G1R 2J6, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Dept Phys Genie Phys & Opt, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
brachytherapy; tissue composition; Monte Carlo; dose calculation; seed implants; ELECTRON-DENSITY CALIBRATION; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; CT NUMBERS; CALCULATION ENGINE; RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SEED IMPLANT; PROSTATE; RADIOTHERAPY; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1118/1.3477161
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: The objective of this work is to assess the sensitivity of Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition for a range of low photon energy brachytherapy sources: I-125, Pd-103, (CS)-C-131, and an electronic brachytherapy source (EBS). The low energy photons emitted by these sources make the dosimetry sensitive to variations in tissue atomic number due to the dominance of the photoelectric effect. This work reports dose to a small mass of water in medium D-w,D-m as opposed to dose to a small mass of medium in medium D-m,D-m. Methods: Mean adipose, mammary gland, and breast tissues (as uniform mixture of the aforementioned tissues) are investigated as well as compositions corresponding to one standard deviation from the mean. Prostate mean compositions from three different literature sources are also investigated. Three sets of MC simulations are performed with the GEANT4 code: (1) Dose calculations for idealized TG-43-like spherical geometries using point sources. Radial dose profiles obtained in different media are compared to assess the influence of compositional uncertainties. (2) Dose calculations for four clinical prostate LDR brachytherapy permanent seed implants using I-125 seeds (Model 2301, Best Medical, Springfield, VA). The effect of varying the prostate composition in the planning target volume (PTV) is investigated by comparing PTV D-90 values. (3) Dose calculations for four clinical breast LDR brachytherapy permanent seed implants using Pd-103 seeds (Model 2335, Best Medical). The effects of varying the adipose/gland ratio in the PTV and of varying the elemental composition of adipose and gland within one standard deviation of the assumed mean composition are investigated by comparing PTV D-90 values. For (2) and (3), the influence of using the mass density from CT scans instead of unit mass density is also assessed. Results: Results from simulation (1) show that variations in the mean compositions of tissues affect low energy brachytherapy dosimetry. Dose differences between mean and one standard deviation of the mean composition increasing with distance from the source are observed. It is established that the I-125 and Cs-131 sources are the least sensitive to variations in elemental compositions while Pd-103 is most sensitive. The EBS falls in between and exhibits complex behavior due to significant spectral hardening. Results from simulation (2) show that two prostate compositions are dosimetrically equivalent to water while the third shows D-90 differences of up to 4%. Results from simulation (3) show that breast is more sensitive than prostate with dose variations of up to 30% from water for 70% adipose/30% gland breast. The variability of the breast composition adds a +/- 10% dose variation. Conclusions: Low energy brachytherapy dose distributions in tissue differ from water and are influenced by density, mean tissue composition, and patient-to-patient composition variations. The results support the use of a dose calculation algorithm accounting for heterogeneities such as MC. Since this work shows that variations in mean tissue compositions affect MC dosimetry and result in increased dose uncertainties, the authors conclude that imaging tools providing more accurate estimates of elemental compositions such as dual energy CT would be beneficial. (C) 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3477161]
引用
收藏
页码:5188 / 5198
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
A Monte Carlo study on the effect of seed design on the interseed attenuation in permanent prostate implants [J].
Afsharpour, Hossein ;
D'Amours, Michel ;
Cote, Benoit ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Beaulieu, Luc .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (08) :3671-3681
[2]
Influence of breast composition and interseed attenuation in dose calculations for post-implant assessment of permanent breast 103Pd seed implant [J].
Afsharpour, Hossein ;
Pignol, Jean-Philippe ;
Keller, Brian ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Reniers, Brigitte ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Beaulieu, Luc .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (16) :4547-4561
[3]
GEANT4-a simulation toolkit [J].
Agostinelli, S ;
Allison, J ;
Amako, K ;
Apostolakis, J ;
Araujo, H ;
Arce, P ;
Asai, M ;
Axen, D ;
Banerjee, S ;
Barrand, G ;
Behner, F ;
Bellagamba, L ;
Boudreau, J ;
Broglia, L ;
Brunengo, A ;
Burkhardt, H ;
Chauvie, S ;
Chuma, J ;
Chytracek, R ;
Cooperman, G ;
Cosmo, G ;
Degtyarenko, P ;
Dell'Acqua, A ;
Depaola, G ;
Dietrich, D ;
Enami, R ;
Feliciello, A ;
Ferguson, C ;
Fesefeldt, H ;
Folger, G ;
Foppiano, F ;
Forti, A ;
Garelli, S ;
Giani, S ;
Giannitrapani, R ;
Gibin, D ;
Cadenas, JJG ;
González, I ;
Abril, GG ;
Greeniaus, G ;
Greiner, W ;
Grichine, V ;
Grossheim, A ;
Guatelli, S ;
Gumplinger, P ;
Hamatsu, R ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Hasui, H ;
Heikkinen, A ;
Howard, A .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) :250-303
[4]
Dose distribution in water for monoenergetic photon point sources in the energy range of interest in brachytherapy: Monte Carlo simulations with PENELOPE and GEANT4 [J].
Almansa, Julio F. ;
Guerrero, Rafael ;
Al-Dweri, Feras M. O. ;
Anguiano, Marta ;
Lallena, Antonio M. .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2007, 76 (05) :766-773
[5]
[Anonymous], 1995, NISTIR
[6]
THE ACCURACY OF SINGLE-SEED DOSE SUPERPOSITION FOR I125 IMPLANTS [J].
BURNS, GS ;
RAESIDE, DE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :627-631
[7]
Postimplant dosimetry using a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine:: A new clinical standard [J].
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
D'Amours, Michel ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Reniers, Brigitte ;
Martin, Andre-Guy ;
Vigneault, Eric ;
Beaulieu, Luc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (04) :1190-1198
[8]
Impact of interseed attenuation and tissue composition for permanent prostate implants [J].
Carrier, JF ;
Beaulieu, L ;
Therriault-Proulx, F ;
Roy, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) :595-604
[9]
Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning [J].
Chetty, Indrin J. ;
Curran, Bruce ;
Cygler, Joanna E. ;
DeMarco, John J. ;
Ezzell, Gary ;
Faddegon, Bruce A. ;
Kawrakow, Iwan ;
Keall, Paul J. ;
Liu, Helen ;
Ma, C. -M. Charlie ;
Rogers, D. W. O. ;
Seuntjens, Jan ;
Sheikh-Bagheri, Daryoush ;
Siebers, Jeffrey V. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) :4818-4853
[10]
MCPI©:: A sub-minute Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for prostate implants [J].
Chibani, O ;
Williamson, JF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) :3688-3698