A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system

被引:37
作者
Chawla, Amarpreet S. [1 ,2 ]
Samei, Ehsan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Saunders, Robert S. [1 ,4 ]
Lo, Joseph Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baker, Jay A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Radiol, Duke Adv Imaging Labs, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Med Phys, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Phys, Durham, NC 27705 USA
关键词
optimization; acquisition parameters; ROC; AUC; Hotelling observer; LG CHO; multiprojection imaging; digital breast tomosynthesis; decision fusion;
D O I
10.1118/1.2885367
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Multiprojection imaging is a technique in which a plurality of digital radiographic images of the same patient are acquired within a short interval of time from slightly different angles. Information from each image is combined to determine the final diagnosis. Projection data are either reconstructed into slices as in the case of tomosynthesis or analyzed directly as in the case of multiprojection correlation imaging technique, thereby avoiding reconstruction artifacts. In this study, the authors investigated the optimum geometry of acquisitions of a multiprojection breast correlation imaging system in terms of the number of projections and their total angular span that yield maximum performance in a task that models clinical decision. Twenty-five angular projections of each breast from 82 human subjects in our breast tomosynthesis database were each supplemented with a simulated 3 mm mass. An approach based on Laguerre-Gauss channelized Hotelling observer was developed to assess the detectability of the mass in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two methodologies were developed to integrate results from individual projections into one combined ROC curve as the overall figure of merit. To optimize the acquisition geometry, different components of acquisitions were changed to investigate which one of the many possible configurations maximized the area under the combined ROC curve. Optimization was investigated under two acquisition dose conditions corresponding to a fixed total dose delivered to the patient and a variable dose condition, based on the number of projections used. In either case, the detectability was dependent on the number of projections used, the total angular span of those projections, and the acquisition dose level. In the first case, the detectability approximately followed a bell curve as a function of the number of projections with the maximum between 8 and 16 projections spanning angular arcs of about 23 degrees-45 degrees, respectively. In the second case, the detectability increased with the number of projections approaching an asymptote at 11-17 projections for an angular span of about 45 degrees. These results indicate the inherent information content of the multiprojection image data reflecting the relative role of quantum and anatomical noise in multiprojection breast imaging. The optimization scheme presented here may be applied to any multiprojection imaging modalities and may be extended by including reconstruction in the case of digital breast tomosynthesis and breast computed tomography. (C) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1345
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise [J].
Barrett, HH ;
Abbey, CK ;
Gallas, B ;
Eckstein, M .
IMAGE PERCEPTION: MEDICAL IMAGING 1998, 1998, 3340 :27-43
[2]  
BOCHUD FO, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2436, P156, DOI 10.1117/12.206845
[3]   Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects [J].
Burgess, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1999, 16 (03) :694-704
[4]   Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Jacobson, FL ;
Judy, PF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) :419-437
[5]   Effect of dose reduction on the detection of mammographic lesions: A mathematical observer model analysis [J].
Chawla, Arnarpreet S. ;
Sarnei, Ehsan ;
Saunders, Robert ;
Abbey, Craig ;
Delong, David .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (08) :3385-3398
[6]   Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential [J].
Dobbins, JT ;
Godfrey, DJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (19) :R65-R106
[7]   Human vs. model observers in anatomic backgrounds [J].
Eckstein, MP ;
Abbey, CK ;
Whiting, JS .
IMAGE PERCEPTION: MEDICAL IMAGING 1998, 1998, 3340 :16-26
[8]  
ECKSTEIN P, 1999, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V3663, P243
[9]  
Getty D. J., 2007, J SOC INF DISPLAY, V23
[10]   A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging [J].
Gong, X ;
Glick, SJ ;
Liu, B ;
Vedula, AA ;
Thacker, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) :1041-1052