Why customers won't relate: Obstacles to relationship marketing engagement

被引:106
作者
Ashley, Christy [1 ]
Noble, Stephanie M. [2 ]
Donthu, Naveen [3 ]
Lemon, Katherine N. [4 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Sch Business Adm, University, MS 38677 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
关键词
Loyalty programs; Relationship marketing; Equity theory; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; SATISFACTION; LOYALTY; EQUITY; SHARE; DETERMINANTS; MOTIVATIONS; COMMITMENT; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.07.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Due to the challenges associated with reaching consumers using traditional marketing approaches, firms increasingly rely on relational marketing tactics to increase customer patronage with the firm. Yet, consumers often actively avoid relational devices. Thus, firms have a heightened interest in factors that affect customer engagement in relationship marketing efforts. This research provides an empirical test of a model based on equity theory and previous findings regarding psychological engagement. The model predicts whether customers are willing to engage in different relational tactics offered by firms, measured by a formative, actionable Relationship Program Receptiveness (RPR) Index. The results indicate customer perceptions of the inconvenience and anticipated benefits, two factors controlled by the firm, affect RPR. In addition, customer factors, including general privacy concerns, involvement and shopping frequency, affect RPR. Managerially, the results suggest specific actions firms can take to increase the likelihood that consumers engage in relational marketing efforts. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 756
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research [J].
Jarvis, CB ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Podsakoff, PM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (02) :199-218
[32]  
KAHN WA, 1990, ACAD MANAGE J, V33, P692, DOI 10.5465/256287
[33]   The effects of loyalty programs on customer lifetime duration and share of wallet [J].
Meyer-Waarden, Lars .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2007, 83 (02) :223-236
[34]   Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives [J].
Miller, RS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (04) :758-766
[35]  
MILNE GR, 1998, 98110 MARK SCI I
[36]   Perceived benefits of loyalty programs: Scale development and implications for relational strategies [J].
Mimouni-Chaabane, Aida ;
Volle, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2010, 63 (01) :32-37
[37]  
Mitchell Alan., 2002, Marketing Week, V25, P30
[38]   Relationship-based competitive advantage: The role of relationship marketing in marketing strategy [J].
Morgan, RM ;
Hunt, S .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1999, 46 (03) :281-290
[39]  
NAKO SM, 1992, LOGIST TRANSPORT REV, V28, P395
[40]  
NEWMAN E, 2008, BRANDWEEK 0331, P8