A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

被引:18650
作者
Henseler, Jorg [1 ,2 ]
Ringle, Christian M. [3 ,4 ]
Sarstedt, Marko [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, ISEGI, P-1200 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Hamburg Univ Technol TUHH, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[5] Univ Magdeburg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[6] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
关键词
Structural equation modeling (SEM); Partial least squares (PLS); Results evaluation; Measurement model assessment; Discriminant validity; Fornell-Larcker criterion; Cross-loadings; Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix; Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; USER ACCEPTANCE; COMMON BELIEFS; PLS-SEM; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; INDEXES; DESIGN; PRAISE;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. We demonstrate its superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Finally, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 135
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
[51]  
HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
[52]  
Hui B.S., 1982, Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part II, P119
[53]  
Hulland J, 1999, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V20, P195, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.3.CO
[54]  
2-Z
[55]   A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Hwang, Heungsun ;
Malhotra, Naresh K. ;
Kim, Youngchan ;
Tomiuk, Marc A. ;
Hong, Sungjin .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (04) :699-712
[56]   Generalized structured component analysis [J].
Hwang, HS ;
Takane, Y .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2004, 69 (01) :81-99
[57]  
John O. P., 2000, Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, P339
[58]  
Klein R, 2009, MIS QUART, V33, P735
[59]  
Lee Lorraine, 2011, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, V12, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.accinf.2011.05.002
[60]   Diffusing the Internet in the Arab world: The role of social norms and technological culturation [J].
Loch, KD ;
Straub, DW ;
Kamel, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2003, 50 (01) :45-63