A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

被引:18650
作者
Henseler, Jorg [1 ,2 ]
Ringle, Christian M. [3 ,4 ]
Sarstedt, Marko [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, ISEGI, P-1200 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Hamburg Univ Technol TUHH, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[5] Univ Magdeburg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[6] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
关键词
Structural equation modeling (SEM); Partial least squares (PLS); Results evaluation; Measurement model assessment; Discriminant validity; Fornell-Larcker criterion; Cross-loadings; Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix; Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; USER ACCEPTANCE; COMMON BELIEFS; PLS-SEM; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; INDEXES; DESIGN; PRAISE;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. We demonstrate its superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Finally, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 135
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
[61]  
Lohmoeller J.B., 1989, LATENT VARIABLE PATH
[62]   Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods [J].
Lu, Irene R. R. ;
Kwan, Ernest ;
Thomas, D. Roland ;
Cedzynski, Marzena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2011, 28 (03) :258-268
[63]  
Macmillan N.A., 2004, Detection Theory: A User's Guide, P3
[64]  
Marcoulides GA, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P717
[65]   Path analysis with composite variables [J].
McDonald, RP .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1996, 31 (02) :239-270
[66]   Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation [J].
Milberg, SJ ;
Smith, HJ ;
Burke, SJ .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (01) :35-57
[67]  
Miller R.G, 1981, SIMULTANEOUS STAT IN
[68]   semPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares [J].
Monecke, Armin ;
Leisch, Friedrich .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2012, 48 (03) :1-32
[69]  
Mulaik S. A., 2009, FDN FACTOR ANAL
[70]  
Netemeyer R. G., 2003, Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications