A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

被引:18650
作者
Henseler, Jorg [1 ,2 ]
Ringle, Christian M. [3 ,4 ]
Sarstedt, Marko [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, ISEGI, P-1200 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Hamburg Univ Technol TUHH, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[5] Univ Magdeburg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[6] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
关键词
Structural equation modeling (SEM); Partial least squares (PLS); Results evaluation; Measurement model assessment; Discriminant validity; Fornell-Larcker criterion; Cross-loadings; Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix; Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; USER ACCEPTANCE; COMMON BELIEFS; PLS-SEM; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; INDEXES; DESIGN; PRAISE;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. We demonstrate its superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Finally, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 135
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
[81]  
Ringle CM, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, pIII
[82]  
Ringle CM, 2010, ANN INFORM SYST, V8, P19, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1280-0_2
[83]   A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling [J].
Ronkko, Mikko ;
Evermann, Joerg .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (03) :425-448
[84]   METHODOLOGY REVIEW - ANALYSIS OF MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRICES [J].
SCHMITT, N ;
STULTS, DM .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1986, 10 (01) :1-22
[85]  
Schmitt N., 1978, Applied Psychological Measurement, V2, P157, DOI [DOI 10.1177/014662167800200201, DOI 10.1177/01466216780020]
[86]   MULTIPLE HYPOTHESIS-TESTING [J].
SHAFFER, JP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 46 :561-584
[87]   Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward [J].
Shah, R ;
Goldstein, SM .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 24 (02) :148-169
[88]   An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research [J].
Shook, CL ;
Ketchen, DJ ;
Hult, GTM ;
Kacmar, KM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (04) :397-404
[89]   Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? A Primer for Using the Partial Least Squares Data Analytic Technique in Group and Organization Research [J].
Sosik, John J. ;
Kahai, Surinder S. ;
Piovoso, Michael J. .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2009, 34 (01) :5-36
[90]   Regularized Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis [J].
Tenenhaus, Arthur ;
Tenenhaus, Michel .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2011, 76 (02) :257-284