Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: Preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise

被引:347
作者
Nakayama, Y
Awai, K
Funama, Y
Hatemura, M
Imuta, M
Nakaura, T
Ryu, D
Morishita, S
Sultana, S
Sato, N
Yamashita, Y
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Sch Hlth Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[3] Philips Med Syst, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2373041655
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the effect of low tube voltage on radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and image noise at abdominal dynamic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study. Prior informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty patients (24 women, 16 men; mean age, 62 years) underwent initial abdominal CT at 120 kV with 100 mL of contrast material (protocol A). Then all patients were randomly assigned to one of two protocols (protocol B, CT at 90 kV with 100 mL contrast material; protocol C, CT at 90 kV with 80 mL contrast material). The CT numbers of their abdominal organs were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Statistical analysis was performed by using the two-tailed paired t test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and K test of interobserver agreement. The radiation dose was measured with a phantom that consisted of glass-rod dosimeters. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis revealed that protocols B and C yielded significantly better enhancement of the aorta, liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidney than did protocol A (P < .05). With qualitative analysis, the difference among the three protocols in regard to image quality was not significant. At 90 kV versus 120 W, the radiation dose reduction in the center of the phantom was 56.8% (6.3 vs 14.6 mGy); in the periphery, it was 46.2% (13.6 vs 25.3 mGy). CONCLUSION: By decreasing the tube voltage, the amount of contrast material can be reduced without image quality degradation. In scans obtained with a low tube voltage, the radiation dose can be reduced as much as 56.8%, and higher contrast material enhancement can be achieved. (c) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 951
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Dosimetric properties of radiophotoluminescent glass rod detector in high-energy photon beams from a linear accelerator and Cyber-Knife [J].
Araki, F ;
Moribe, N ;
Shimonobou, T ;
Yamashita, Y .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (07) :1980-1986
[2]
Measurements of Gamma-Knife helmet output factors using a radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter and a diode detector [J].
Araki, F ;
Ikegami, T ;
Ishidoya, T ;
Kubo, HD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :1976-1981
[3]
Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer [J].
Brenner, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :440-445
[4]
Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :735-738
[5]
Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[6]
QUANTITATIVE THEORY OF HOUNSFIELD UNIT AND ITS APPLICATION TO DUAL ENERGY SCANNING [J].
BROOKS, RA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1977, 1 (04) :487-493
[7]
Cohnen M, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1654
[8]
Sample size estimation: How many individuals should be studied? [J].
Eng, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) :309-313
[9]
Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: Phantom study [J].
Funama, Y ;
Awai, K ;
Nakayama, Y ;
Kakei, K ;
Nagasue, N ;
Shimamura, M ;
Sato, N ;
Sultana, S ;
Morishita, S ;
Yamashita, Y .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) :905-910
[10]
Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography [J].
Hara, AK ;
Johnson, CD ;
Reed, JE ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Nelson, H ;
Ehman, RL ;
Harmsen, WS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) :1181-1184