A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:19
作者
Phillips, MH
Singer, KM
Hounsell, AR
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/018
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The increasing use of irregularly shaped, off-centre fields in advanced treatment techniques, particularly intensity modulated radiation therapy, has strained the limits of conventional, broad-beam dose calculation algorithms. More recent models, such as kernel-based pencil beams and Monte Carlo methods, are accurate but suffer from the time needed for calculations and from the lack of clearly established methods for determining the parameters needed to match calculations with the particular dosimetric characteristics of an individual machine. This paper presents the implementation of a model that uses an extended source model to calculate the variation of fluence at the patient surface for any arbitrarily shaped field. It uses a macropencil beam model to calculate phantom scatter. Both head scatter and phantom scatter models use exponential functions fit to a series of measurements to determine the model's parameters. The means by which the model can be implemented in a clinical setting using standard dosimetric equipment is presented. Results for two separate machines and three energies are presented. Comparisons with measurements for a set of regular and irregular fields demonstrate the accuracy of the model for conventional, conformal and intensity modulated treatments. For rectangular and irregular fields at depths up to 20 cm, the accuracy was better than less than or equal to 1.5%, compared with errors of up to 7.5% with a standard algorithm. For a 20-step intensity modulated field, the accuracy was 3.4% compared with 18% with the conventional algorithm. The advantages of this model for IMRT are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1088
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   ON THE FIELD-SIZE DEPENDENCE OF RELATIVE OUTPUT FROM A LINEAR-ACCELERATOR [J].
DUNSCOMBE, PB ;
NIEMINEN, JM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (06) :1441-1444
[12]   A Monte Carlo approach to patient-specific dosimetry [J].
Furhang, EE ;
Chui, CS ;
Sgouros, G .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (09) :1523-1529
[13]  
HILL RW, 1997, 12 INT C US COMP RAD, P394
[14]   Head scatter modelling for irregular field shaping and beam intensity modulation [J].
Hounsell, AR ;
Wilkinson, JM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (09) :1737-1749
[15]   The variation in output of symmetric, asymmetric and irregularly shaped wedged radiotherapy fields [J].
Hounsell, AR ;
Wilkinson, JM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (10) :2155-2172
[16]   TISSUE STANDARD RATIOS FOR IRREGULARLY SHAPED RADIOTHERAPY FIELDS [J].
HOUNSELL, AR ;
WILKINSON, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (752) :629-634
[17]  
HOUNSELL AR, 1994, P 11 ICCR, P234
[18]   X-RAY SOURCES OF MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATORS - FOCAL AND EXTRA-FOCAL RADIATION [J].
JAFFRAY, DA ;
BATTISTA, JJ ;
FENSTER, A ;
MUNRO, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (05) :1417-1427
[19]  
JOHNS HE, 1983, PHYSICS RADIOLOGY, P370
[20]  
KALET I, 1997, 971202 U WASH