Analysis of aromatic aldehydes in brandy and wine by high-performance capillary electrophoresis

被引:34
作者
Panossian, A
Mamikonyan, G
Torosyan, M
Gabrielyan, E
Mkhitaryan, S
机构
[1] Armenian Drug & Med Technol Agcy, Guelbenkian Lab, Yerevan 375051, Armenia
[2] Yerevan Brandy Co, Grp Pernod Ricard, Yerevan, Armenia
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ac0014818
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A new method of analysis of vanillin, syringaldehyde, coniferaldehyde, and sinapaldehyde in brandy and wine by high-performance capillary electrophoresis is described. Electrophoretic mobility of these compounds is achieved by a borate buffer at pH 9.3. At this pH, the sensitivity of UV detection of these phenolic aldehydes also increases. UV absorptions at 348, 362, 404, and 422 nm were selected for monitoring vanillin, syringaldehyde, coniferaldehyde, and sinapaldehyde, respectively. This procedure was performed simultaneously during one run using a diode array detector. Samples of brandy or wine were analyzed directly without concentration, extraction, or any other preliminary treatment of the test sample. The limits of detection were found to be 0.275, 0.1425, 0.1475, and 0.1975 ppm for syringaldehyde, coniferaldehyde, sinapaldehyde, and vanillin, respectively, which is acceptable for analysis of both brandy and wine aged in oak barrels. The method has been shown to be linear in a range from 0.3 to 57 mg/L. Recoveries ranged between 99.9% and 107.7% for all of the compounds tested. Repeatability and reproducibility of the method were high. The relative standard deviation was consequently similar to3% and also between 4.47% and 6.89% for all tested compounds. The method is useful for the identification of counterfeit brandy, which is easy to recognize by the absence of sinapaldehyde, syringaldehyde, and coniferaldehyde, which are not detectable in false brandy.
引用
收藏
页码:4379 / 4383
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   FRACTIONATION AND HPLC DETERMINATION OF GRAPE PHENOLICS [J].
JAWORSKI, AW ;
LEE, CY .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1987, 35 (02) :257-259
[12]   Chromatographic method validation: A review of current practices and procedures .2. Guidelines for primary validation parameters. [J].
Jenke, DR .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 1996, 19 (05) :737-757
[13]  
LEHTONEN M, 1983, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V66, P71
[14]   Evolution of aromatic and furanic congeners in the maturation of cider brandy: A contribution to its characterization [J].
Mangas, J ;
Rodriguez, R ;
Moreno, J ;
Suarez, B ;
Blanco, D .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1996, 44 (10) :3303-3307
[15]   Furanic and phenolic composition of cider brandy. A chemometric study [J].
Mangas, JJ ;
Rodriguez, R ;
Moreno, J ;
Suarez, B ;
Blanco, D .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (10) :4076-4079
[16]   THE INFLUENCE OF OAK ON THE FURANIC ALDEHYDE CONTENTS OF DISTILLATES SUBJECTED TO AGING [J].
MIR, MV ;
DELASERRANA, HLG ;
MARTINEZ, CL ;
GRANADOS, JQ .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1991, 14 (19) :3615-3621
[17]   HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY DETERMINATION OF FURANIC COMPOUNDS IN COMMERCIAL BRANDIES AND CARAMELS [J].
MIR, MV ;
GRANADOS, JQ ;
DELASERRANA, HLG ;
MARTINEZ, MCL .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1992, 15 (03) :513-524
[18]   Exhaustion techniques in the selection and description of phenolic compounds in Jerez wine extracts obtained by an accelerated aging technique [J].
Monedero, L ;
Olalla, M ;
Quesada, JJ ;
Ga, HL ;
Martinez, MCL .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (05) :1754-1764
[19]  
OSZIMIANSKI J, 1986, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V30, P198