Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction

被引:33
作者
Nordmann, AJ [1 ]
Bucher, H [1 ]
Hengstler, P [1 ]
Harr, T [1 ]
Young, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Basel Inst Clin Epidemiol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2005年 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD005313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Balloon angioplasty following myocardial infarction (MI) reduces death, non-fatal MI and stroke compared to thrombolytic reperfusion. However up to 50% of patients experience restenosis and 3% to 5% recurrent myocardial infarction. Therefore, primary stenting may offer additional benefits compared to balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Objectives To examine whether primary stenting compared to primary balloon angioplasty reduces clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pascal, Index medicus and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register ( The Cochrane Library) from 1979 to March 2002. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials of primary stenting or balloon angioplasty prior to the invasive procedure; intervention in native coronary arteries within 24 hours after onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction; report of death or reinfarction; and follow-up of at least 1 month. Trials were excluded when randomisation occurred after an invasive procedure and if they exclusively included patients with cardiogenic shock. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data from identified trials. Outcomes included mortality, reinfarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, target vessel revascularization, need for vascular repair or blood transfusion. Peto odds ratios were calculated. To explore the stability of the overall treatment effect various sensitivity analyses were performed. Main results We included nine trials of 4433 participants. Odds ratios for mortality after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty at 30 days, 6 and 12 months were 1.16 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.73), 1.27 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.83), and 1.06 ( 95% CI 0.77 to 1.45). At 30 days, 6 and 12 months odds ratios for reinfarction after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty were 0.52 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.87), 0.67 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.00), and 0.67 (95% CI 0.45-0.98) and odds ratio for target vessel revascularization after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty were 0.45 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.60), 0.42 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.51), and 0.47 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57). The odds ratio for post-interventional bleeding complications after stenting compared to balloon angioplasty was 1.34 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.88; test of heterogeneity p 0.1). Authors' conclusions There is no evidence to suggest that primary stenting reduces mortality when compared to balloon angioplasty. Stenting seems to be associated with a reduced risk of reinfarction and target vessel revascularization, but potential confounding due to unbalanced postinterventional antithrombotic/anticoagulant therapies can not be ruled out on basis of this review.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 6 COCHR C BALT MD US
[2]   A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction - Results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial [J].
Antoniucci, D ;
Santoro, GM ;
Bolognese, L ;
Valenti, R ;
Trapani, M ;
Fazzini, PF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (06) :1234-1239
[3]   Does ticlopidine reduce reocclusion and other adverse events after successful balloon angioplasty of occluded coronary arteries? Results from the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) [J].
Berger, PB ;
Dzavik, V ;
Penn, IM ;
Catellier, D ;
Buller, CE .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 142 (05) :776-781
[4]   Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting - The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (FANTASTIC) study [J].
Bertrand, ME ;
Legrand, V ;
Boland, J ;
Fleck, E ;
Bonnier, J ;
Emmanuelson, H ;
Vrolix, M ;
Missault, L ;
Chierchia, S ;
Casaccia, M ;
Niccoli, L ;
Oto, A ;
White, C ;
Webb-Peploe, M ;
Van Belle, E ;
McFadden, EP .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (16) :1597-1603
[5]   Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START) -: A four-year follow-up [J].
Betriu, A ;
Masotti, M ;
Serra, A ;
Alonso, J ;
Fernández-Avilés, F ;
Gimeno, F ;
Colman, T ;
Zueco, J ;
Delcan, JL ;
García, E ;
Calabuig, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (05) :1498-1506
[6]   Comparison of stenting and balloon angioplasty for narrowings in aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits in place for more than five years [J].
Brener, SJ ;
Ellis, SG ;
AppersonHansen, C ;
Leon, MB ;
Topol, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (01) :13-18
[7]  
Briguori C, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V50, P390, DOI 10.1002/1522-726X(200008)50:4<390::AID-CCD4>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-S
[9]   Primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in occluded coronary arteries - The total occlusion study of Canada (TOSCA) [J].
Buller, CE ;
Dzavik, V ;
Carere, RG ;
Mancini, GBJ ;
Barbeau, G ;
Lazzam, C ;
Anderson, TJ ;
Knudtson, ML ;
Marquis, JF ;
Suzuki, T ;
Cohen, EA ;
Fox, RS ;
Teo, KK .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (03) :236-242
[10]   Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris [J].
Carrié, D ;
Khalifé, K ;
Citron, B ;
Izaaz, K ;
Hamon, M ;
Juiliard, JM ;
Leclercq, F ;
Fourcade, J ;
Lipiecki, J ;
Sabatier, R ;
Boulet, V ;
Rinaldi, JP ;
Mourali, J ;
Sabatier, R ;
Boulet, V ;
Rinaldi, JP ;
Mourali, S ;
Fatouch, M ;
El Mokhtar, E ;
Aboujaoudé, F ;
Elbaz, M ;
Grolleau, R ;
Steg, PG ;
Puel, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 87 (06) :693-698