Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system

被引:48
作者
Fetterly, KA [1 ]
Hangiandreou, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
detective quantum efficiency; computed radiography; x-ray spectra; patient equivalent phantom; modulation transfer function; noise power spectrum;
D O I
10.1118/1.1339883
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The effect of incident x-ray beam quality on the measured detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a computed radiography system was investigated. The incident x-ray beams used had peak tube potentials of 70, 95, and 120 kVp, were filtered with various thicknesses of a "patient equivalent phantom" (PEP), aluminum, and copper, and provided a consistent exposure to the storage phosphor. For each peak tube potential and filter combination, the one-dimensional modulation transfer function and noise power spectrum were measured and the square of the incident signal-to-noise ratio was estimated. The spatial frequency dependent DQE was calculated from these data. The DQE was integrated to provide an overall estimate of the efficiency and frequency response of the computed radiography system for the various x-ray beams. There was found to be a wide range of integral DQE (IDQE) values for the peak tube potential and filter combinations used. For example, the IDQE ranged from 3.0 to 0.9 mm(-2) using the peak tube potential and filter combinations 70 kVp with 5.1 cm PEP and 120 kVp with 30.3 cm PEP, respectively. Finally, peak tube potential and filter combinations 70 kVp with 10.2 cm PEP and 120 kVp with 20.2 cm PEP were chosen as standard x-ray beams that will be used at our facility to measure the DQE of digital radiographic imaging systems for evaluation and acceptance testing. (C) 2001 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ARMILLE PA, 1979, AAPM MONOGRAPH, V3, P105
[2]   Accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV [J].
Boone, JM ;
Seibert, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (11) :1661-1670
[3]   Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics [J].
Boone, JM ;
Chavez, AE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (12) :1997-2005
[4]   Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system [J].
Bradford, CD ;
Peppler, WW ;
Dobbins, JT .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (01) :27-37
[5]   Quality control phantom for digital chest radiography [J].
Chotas, HG ;
Floyd, CE ;
Johnson, GA ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (01) :111-116
[6]   A PATIENT-EQUIVALENT ATTENUATION PHANTOM FOR ESTIMATING PATIENT EXPOSURES FROM AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROLLED X-RAY EXAMINATIONS OF THE ABDOMEN AND LUMBOSACRAL SPINE [J].
CONWAY, BJ ;
DUFF, JE ;
FEWELL, TR ;
JENNINGS, RJ ;
ROTHENBERG, LN ;
FLEISCHMAN, RC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (03) :448-453
[7]   A METHOD FOR MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION DETERMINATION FROM EDGE PROFILES WITH CORRECTION FOR FINITE-ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
CUNNINGHAM, IA ;
FENSTER, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (04) :533-537
[8]   DQE(F) OF 4 GENERATIONS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY ACQUISITION DEVICES [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
ERGUN, DL ;
RUTZ, L ;
HINSHAW, DA ;
BLUME, H ;
CLARK, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1581-1593
[9]   Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system [J].
Fetterly, KA ;
Hangiandreou, NJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (12) :2669-2679
[10]  
FETTERLY KA, 2000, IN PRESS SPIE MED IM