Comments on selected fundamental aspects of microarray analysis

被引:24
作者
Riva, A
Carpentier, AS
Torrésani, B
Hénaut, A
机构
[1] Lab Genome & Informat, UMR 8116, F-91034 Evry, France
[2] Univ Aix Marseille 1, CMI, LATP, F-13453 Marseille, France
关键词
microarrays; fundamental tools; FAQ section;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.08.006
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Microarrays are becoming a ubiquitous took of research in life sciences. However, the working principles of microarray-based methodologies are often misunderstood or apparently ignored by the researchers who actually perform and interpret experiments. This in turn seems to lead to a common over-expectation regarding the explanatory and/or knowledge-generating power of microarray analyses. In this note we intend to explain basic principles of five (5) major groups of analytical techniques used in studies of microarray data and their interpretation: the principal component analysis (PCA), the independent component analysis (ICA), the t-test, the analysis of variance (ANOVA), and self organizing maps (SOM). We discuss answers to selected practical questions related to the analysis of microarray data. We also take a closer look at the experimental setup and the rules, which have to be observed in order to exploit microarrays efficiently. Finally, we discuss in detail the scope and limitations of microarray-based methods. We emphasize the fact that no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for (or replace) a well thought through experimental setup. We conclude that microarrays are indeed useful tools in life sciences but by no means should they be expected to generate complete answers to complex biological questions. We argue that even well posed questions, formulated within a microarray-specific terminology, cannot be completely answered with the use of microarray analyses alone. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 336
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
[51]   The difficult interpretation of transcriptome data:: the case of the GATC regulatory network [J].
Riva, A ;
Delorme, MO ;
Chevalier, T ;
Guilhot, N ;
Hénaut, C ;
Hénaut, A .
COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 28 (02) :109-118
[52]   Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays:: a multiplicative noise model [J].
Sásik, R ;
Calvo, E ;
Corbeil, J .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 18 (12) :1633-1640
[53]   QUANTITATIVE MONITORING OF GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS WITH A COMPLEMENTARY-DNA MICROARRAY [J].
SCHENA, M ;
SHALON, D ;
DAVIS, RW ;
BROWN, PO .
SCIENCE, 1995, 270 (5235) :467-470
[54]  
Sekowska A, 2001, GENOME BIOL, V2
[55]   Prognostic meta-signature of breast cancer developed by two-stage mixture modeling of microarray data [J].
Shen, RL ;
Ghosh, D ;
Chinnaiyan, AM .
BMC GENOMICS, 2004, 5 (1)
[56]   Class prediction and discovery using gene microarray and proteomics mass spectroscopy data: curses, caveats, cautions [J].
Somorjai, RL ;
Dolenko, B ;
Baumgartner, R .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (12) :1484-1491
[57]   Inferring dynamic architecture of cellular networks using time series of gene expression, protein and metabolite data [J].
Sontag, E ;
Kiyatkin, A ;
Kholodenko, BN .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (12) :1877-1886
[58]   ANALYZING AND COMPARING NUCLEIC-ACID SEQUENCES BY HYBRIDIZATION TO ARRAYS OF OLIGONUCLEOTIDES - EVALUATION USING EXPERIMENTAL-MODELS [J].
SOUTHERN, EM ;
MASKOS, U ;
ELDER, JK .
GENOMICS, 1992, 13 (04) :1008-1017
[59]   Genetic analysis of the circadian system in Drosophila melanogaster and mammals [J].
Stanewsky, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY, 2003, 54 (01) :111-147
[60]   A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis [J].
Statnikov, A ;
Aliferis, CF ;
Tsamardinos, I ;
Hardin, D ;
Levy, S .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (05) :631-643