16 T Diffusion Microimaging of Fixed Prostate Tissue: Preliminary Findings

被引:35
作者
Bourne, Roger [1 ]
Kurniawan, Nyoman
Cowin, Gary [2 ]
Syed, Paul [3 ]
Watson, Geoff [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Med Radiat Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Adv Imaging, Nat Imaging Facil, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Urol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
diffusion; microimaging; prostate; DTI; CANCER; COEFFICIENTS; DECAY; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.22778
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Diffusion tensor microimaging was used to investigate the water diffusion properties of formalin-fixed prostate tissue at spatial resolution approaching the cellular scale. Diffusion tensor microimaging was performed at 16.4 T with 40 mu m isotropic voxels. Diffusion tensor microimaging clearly demonstrated distinct microscopic diffusion environments and tissue architecture consistent with that seen on light microscopy of the same tissue. The most restricted diffusion environment is the secretory epithelial cell layer (voxel bulk mean diffusivity, D = 0.4 +/- 0.1 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec). Diffusion in the fibromuscular stromal matrix is relatively less restricted (D = 0.7 +/- 0.1 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec). In tumor tissue (Gleason pattern 4+4) distinct glandular and ductal structures are absent in the diffusion-weighted images and diffusivity is low (D = 0.5 +/- 0.1 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec). Distinct stromal and epithelial diffusion compartments are the most likely origin of biexponential diffusion decay observed in vivo. Magn Reson Med 66:244-247, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 247
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review [J].
Basser, PJ ;
Jones, DK .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 15 (7-8) :456-467
[2]   Correlation of ADC and T2 Measurements With Cell Density in Prostate Cancer at 3.0 Tesla [J].
Gibbs, Peter ;
Liney, Gary P. ;
Pickles, Martin D. ;
Zelhof, Bashar ;
Rodrigues, Greta ;
Turnbull, Lindsay W. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (09) :572-576
[3]  
Haker SJ, 2005, 13 ANN M ISMRM MIAM
[4]   Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Prostate Cancer Versus Noncancerous Tissue According to Anatomical Region [J].
Kim, Jeoung Hyun ;
Kim, Jeong Kon ;
Park, Bum-Woo ;
Kim, Namkug ;
Cho, Kyoung-Sik .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (05) :1173-1179
[5]   Prostate Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map with T2-weighted Images for Detection-A Multireader Study [J].
Lim, Hyun Kyung ;
Kim, Jeong Kon ;
Kim, Kyung Ah ;
Cho, Kyoung-Sik .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (01) :145-151
[6]   Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection [J].
Morgan, V. A. ;
Kyriazi, S. ;
Ashley, S. E. ;
DeSouza, N. M. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (06) :695-703
[7]   Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range [J].
Mulkern, RV ;
Barnes, AS ;
Haker, SJ ;
Hung, YP ;
Rybicki, FJ ;
Maier, SE ;
Tempany, CMC .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (05) :563-568
[8]  
Reinsberg S, 2005, 13 ANN M ISMRM MIAM
[9]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients [J].
Riches, S. F. ;
Hawtin, K. ;
Charles-Edwards, E. M. ;
de Souza, N. M. .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 22 (03) :318-325
[10]   Dynamic MRI and CAD vs. Choline MRS: Where is the detection level for a lesion characterisation in prostate cancer? [J].
Schmuecking, Michael ;
Boltze, Carsten ;
Geyer, Hagen ;
Salz, Henning ;
Schilling, Bert ;
Wendt, Thomas G. ;
Kloetzer, Karl-Heinz ;
Marx, Christiane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 85 (09) :814-824