Beam characteristics of a retrofitted double-focused multileaf collimator

被引:60
作者
Das, IJ [1 ]
Desobry, GE [1 ]
McNeeley, SW [1 ]
Cheng, EC [1 ]
Schultheiss, TE [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
multileaf collimator; double-focused leaves; beam characteristics;
D O I
10.1118/1.598348
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Multileaf collimators (MLCs) are generally believed to be convenient and cost-effective tools for intensity modulation and conformal therapy. They are becoming a standard feature on new accelerators; however, the older units can be retrofitted with modern MLCs. Before such a unit can be clinically used, the beam characteristics must be verified. In this study the beam characteristics of a Siemens double-focused MLC retrofitted to an MD2 linear accelerator are presented. The head leakage along with inter- and intra-leaf radiation transmission were measured using film. The collimator (S-c), phantom (S-p), total (S-cp) scatter factors, central axis depth dose, beam profiles for off-axis ratios, penumbra, and surface dose were evaluated for square, rectangular, and irregularly shaped fields. The maximum head leakage was estimated to be <0.05% in any plane at a distance of 1 m and maximum transmission through the MLC leaves was estimated to be <1.4% and <1.1% for the 10 MV and 6 MV beams, respectively. The maximum differences between pre- and post-MLC installation data for the S-c and S-cp were less than or equal to 0.7% and less than or equal to 1.4%, respectively. Similarly, the percent depth dose data for all fields and both beam energies were within 1.5% of the original data. The beam profiles measured at various depths were also in agreement with those of the pre-MLC installation data. The measured beam penumbra (20%-80%) showed a range of 7.8 mm-11.0 mm for the 6 MV and 8.4 mm-11.1 mm for the 10 MV beams from smallest to largest fields. These ranges differ by less than a millimeter from those of the old data. The surface dose measurements were slightly lower than the conventional jaw values suggesting that MLC does not produce significant electron contamination. It is concluded that the retrofitted MLC maintains the integrity of the original beam and may provide a cost-effective conformal therapy. (C) 1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1676 / 1684
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Changes to dose in the build-up region when using multi-leaf collimators in place of lead blocks supported on an accessory tray [J].
Adams, EJ ;
Hounsell, AR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (03) :225-229
[2]  
ARIBISALA E, 1993, RAD THERAP, V2, P27
[3]   IMPACT OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR ON TREATMENT MORBIDITY IN LOCALIZED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
AUSTINSEYMOUR, M ;
CAPLAN, R ;
RUSSELL, K ;
LARAMORE, G ;
JACKY, J ;
WOOTTON, P ;
HUMMEL, S ;
LINDSLEY, K ;
GRIFFIN, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (05) :1065-1071
[4]   MODIFICATION OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM FOR THE USE OF MULTI-LEAF COLLIMATORS IN CONFORMATION RADIOTHERAPY [J].
BOESECKE, R ;
BECKER, G ;
ALANDT, K ;
PASTYR, O ;
DOLL, J ;
SCHLEGEL, W ;
LORENZ, WJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1991, 21 (04) :261-268
[5]   Geometric analysis of light-field position of a multileaf collimator with curved ends [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Li, SD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (05) :757-762
[6]   CLINICAL DOSIMETRY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR [J].
BOYER, AL ;
OCHRAN, TG ;
NYERICK, CE ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
HUNTZINGER, CJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (05) :1255-1261
[7]   DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND CLINICAL POSSIBILITIES WITH A NEW GENERATION OF RADIATION-THERAPY EQUIPMENT - A REVIEW [J].
BRAHME, A .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1987, 26 (06) :403-412
[8]   Dosimetry of high energy photon and electron beams with CEA films [J].
Cheng, CW ;
Das, IJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (07) :1225-1232
[9]  
Coia L R, 1995, PRACTICAL GUIDE CT S
[10]   Surface and percentage depth doses for secondary blocking using a multileaf collimator and cerrobend-alloy blocks [J].
Dawson, J ;
Kahler, D ;
McDonald, B ;
Kopecky, W ;
Gu, J .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 42 (03) :285-288