The repeated evaluation technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness

被引:89
作者
Carbon, CC
Leder, H
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Psychol Basic Res, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Free Univ Berlin, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1002/acp.1098
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Innovativeness is defined as 'originality by virtue of introducing new ideas'. Thus, innovative designs often break common visual habits and are evaluated as relatively unattractive at first sight (Leder & Carbon, 2005). In most empirical studies, attractiveness is measured only once. These measures do not capture the dynamic aspects of innovation. This paper presents a dynamic procedure, the Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET), that improves the validity of attractiveness evaluations. RET simulates time and exposure effects of everyday life. Using RET, we investigated the appreciation of different car designs varying in innovativeness and curvature. While the mere exposure theory (Zajonc, 1968) would predict a general increase of liking in increasing exposure, FET revealed dissociate effects depending on innovativeness. Only innovative designs showed art increase in attractiveness. Low innovative designs were rated as being relatively attractive in the beginning, but did not profit from elaboration due to RET. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 601
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]  
Leder Helmut, 2003, Empirical studies of the arts, V21, P165, DOI [10.2190/G6MK-6KL7-KETB-ELND, DOI 10.2190/G6MK-6KL7-KETB-ELND]
[22]   The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited [J].
Lee, AY .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (10) :1255-1266
[23]  
Light L.L., 1981, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, V7, P269, DOI DOI 10.1177/014616728172014
[24]   ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING THE DETERMINANTS OF TYPICALITY [J].
LOKEN, B ;
WARD, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1990, 17 (02) :111-126
[25]   Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: An illustrative framework and an application [J].
Mairesse, J ;
Mohnen, P .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (02) :226-230
[26]   AESTHETIC PREFERENCE - ANOMALOUS FINDINGS FOR BERLYNE PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL THEORY [J].
MARTINDALE, C ;
MOORE, K ;
BORKUM, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 103 (01) :53-80
[27]   PRIMING, PROTOTYPICALITY, AND PREFERENCE [J].
MARTINDALE, C ;
MOORE, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1988, 14 (04) :661-670
[28]  
Martindale C., 1988, Empir. Stud. Arts, V6, P79, DOI [DOI 10.2190/MCAJ-0GQT-DJTL-LNQD, 10.2190/MCAJ-0GQT-DJTL-LNQD]
[29]   SCHEMA CONGRUITY AS A BASIS FOR PRODUCT EVALUATION [J].
MEYERSLEVY, J ;
TYBOUT, AM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1989, 16 (01) :39-54
[30]   EVALUATION OF BRAND EXTENSIONS - THE ROLE OF PRODUCT FEATURE SIMILARITY AND BRAND CONCEPT CONSISTENCY [J].
PARK, CW ;
MILBERG, S ;
LAWSON, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1991, 18 (02) :185-193