Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method

被引:600
作者
Low, DA [1 ]
Dempsey, JF
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
radiation therapy; intensity modulated radiation therapy; dose distribution comparison; gamma tool;
D O I
10.1118/1.1598711
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The gamma tool was developed to quantitatively compare dose distributions, either measured or calculated. Before computing gamma, the dose and distance scales of the two distributions, referred to as evaluated and reference, are renormalized by dose and distance criteria, respectively. The renormalization allows the dose distribution comparison to be conducted simultaneously along dose and distance axes. The gamma quantity, calculated independently for each reference point, is the minimum distance in the renormalized multidimensional space between the evaluated distribution and the reference point. The gamma quantity degenerates to the dose-difference and distance-to-agreement tests in shallow and very steep dose gradient regions, respectively. Since being introduced, the gamma quantity has been used by investigators to evaluate dose calculation algorithms, and compare dosimetry measurements. This manuscript examines the gamma distribution behavior in two dimensions and evaluates the gamma distribution in the presence of data noise. Noise in the evaluated distribution causes the gamma distribution to be underestimated relative to the no-noise condition. Noise in the reference distribution adds noise in the gamma distribution in proportion to the normalized dose noise. In typical clinical use, the fraction of points that exceed 3% and 3 mm can be extensive, so we typically use 5% and 2-3 mm in clinical evaluations. For clinical cases, the calculation time is typically 5 minutes for a 1 X 1 mm(2) interpolated resolution on an 800 MHz Pentium 4 for a 14.1 X 15.2 cm(2) radiographic film. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2455 / 2464
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Agazaryan Nzhde, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P40, DOI 10.1120/1.1525243
[2]   IMAGING OF SPATIAL RADIATION-DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN AGAROSE GELS USING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE [J].
APPLEBY, A ;
CHRISTMAN, EA ;
LEGHROUZ, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (03) :382-384
[3]   Systematic verification of a three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm [J].
Cheng, A ;
Harms, WB ;
Gerber, RL ;
Wong, JW ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (05) :685-693
[4]   Variation of sensitometric curves of radiographic films in high energy photon beams [J].
Danciu, C ;
Proimos, BS ;
Rosenwald, JC ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (06) :966-974
[5]  
DeMarco John J, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P66, DOI 10.1120/1.1534490
[6]   A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation [J].
Depuydt, T ;
Van Esch, A ;
Huyskens, DP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :309-319
[7]   High-resolution dose profile studies based on MR Imaging with polymer BANG™ gels in stereotactic radiation techniques [J].
Ertl, A ;
Berg, A ;
Zehetmayer, M ;
Frigo, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (03) :343-349
[8]   A SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR FILM DOSIMETRY [J].
EVANS, MDC ;
SCHREINER, LJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 23 (04) :265-267
[9]  
Hale J I, 1994, Med Dosim, V19, P43
[10]   A software toes for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms [J].
Harms, WB ;
Low, DA ;
Wong, JW ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1830-1836