FRAME and the royal commission on environmental pollution: Common recommendations for assessing risks posed by chemicals under the EU REACH system

被引:8
作者
Combes, RD [1 ]
Dandrea, J [1 ]
Balls, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Russell & Burch House, FRAME, Nottingham NG1 4EE, England
来源
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS | 2003年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
chemicals testing; environmental pollution; FRAME; REACH; royal commission;
D O I
10.1177/026119290303100508
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This document discusses recommendations made by FRAME and the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) with regard to the current European Commission proposals on the Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals (REACH) system for assessing the risks of chemicals to humans, wildlife and the environment. Of several common aims and recommendations, the two most important are: a) the greater use of non-animal testing methods, especially computational prediction methods (for example, [quantitative] structure-activity relationships, expert systems and biokinetic modelling) for prioritising chemicals for hazard assessment; and b) the greater use of intelligent exposure-based targeted risk assessment, with less emphasis being placed on tonnage-triggers. FRAME has produced a decision-tree testing scheme to illustrate the way in which these approaches could be used, together with in vitro test methods. This scheme has been slightly modified to take account of proposals subsequently made by the RCEP. In addition, FRAME points out that new and improved computational methods are needed through more coordinated research, and that these and existing methods need to be validated. The similarities between the independent publications of FRAME and the RCEP add weight to the recommendations that each have made concerning the implementation of the REACH system.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 535
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
Cronin M.T.D., 2004, PREDICTING CHEM TOXI
[12]   Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances [J].
Cronin, MTD ;
Walker, JD ;
Jaworska, JS ;
Comber, MHI ;
Watts, CD ;
Worth, AP .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (10) :1376-1390
[13]   Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances [J].
Cronin, MTD ;
Jaworska, JS ;
Walker, JD ;
Comber, MHI ;
Watts, CD ;
Worth, AP .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (10) :1391-1401
[14]   A survey of stakeholder organisations on the proposed new European chemicals policy [J].
Dandrea, J ;
Combes, RD .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2003, 31 (05) :501-528
[15]   In silico prediction of drug toxicity [J].
Dearden, JC .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2003, 17 (02) :119-127
[16]   ECVAM's response to the changing political environment for alternatives: Consequences of the European Union chemicals and cosmetics policies [J].
Hartung, T ;
Bremer, S ;
Casati, S ;
Coecke, S ;
Corvi, R ;
Fortaner, S ;
Gribaldo, L ;
Halder, M ;
Roi, AJ ;
Prieto, P ;
Sabbioni, E ;
Worth, A ;
Zuang, V .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2003, 31 (05) :473-481
[17]  
*IEH, 1999, PHYS BAS PHARM MOD
[18]  
JAWORSKA JS, 2003, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V111, P138
[19]  
*RCEP, 2003, 5827 RCEP
[20]   Guidelines for developing and using quantitative structure-activity relationships [J].
Walker, JD ;
Jaworska, J ;
Comber, MHI ;
Schultz, TW ;
Dearden, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2003, 22 (08) :1653-1665