Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: Comparison of prone and supine measurements

被引:17
作者
Lambrinoudaki, I
Georgiou, E
Douskas, G
Tsekes, G
Kyriakidis, M
Proukakis, C
机构
[1] Ygias Melathron Gen Hosp, Dept Bone Metab, Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
来源
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 1998年 / 47卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90309-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to assess whether changes in the interposition of body compartments affect the results of body composition measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the fan-beam mode. Thirty healthy subjects underwent two sequential measurements: the first was performed in the supine position as described by the manufacturer, and the second in the prone position, Estimates of body composition were compared between the two measurements. Mean body weight did not differ between measurements ([mean +/- SD] supine v prone, 68.561 +/- 12.461 v 68.589 +/- 12.469 kg). Mean bone mineral content (BMC) was lower in the prone position versus the supine position. When the head was excluded, this difference reached statistical significance (supine v prone, 1,738 +/- 361 v 1,688 +/- 360 g, P = .0001). The mean fat tissue mass (FTM) was lower and lean tissue mass (LTM) higher in the prone measurements. When the head was excluded, the mean FTM difference between the two measurements became greater (FTM supine v prone, 25.129 +/- 10.445 v 24.030 +/- 10.388 kg, P = .0001; LTM supine v prone, 37.309 +/- 9.357 v 38.246 +/- 9.150 kg, P = .0001). It is concluded that the positioning of the patient on the examination tal,le affects DEXA body composition measurements by the fan-beam mode. This could imply a lack of accuracy of the method, which may be due to subtle changes in regional tissue depth and fat distribution caused by patient repositioning. Copyright (C) 1998 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1382
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CROSS CALIBRATION OF QDR-2000 AND QDR-1000 DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY DENSITOMETERS FOR BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE MEASUREMENTS [J].
ABRAHAMSEN, B ;
GRAM, J ;
HANSEN, TB ;
BECKNIELSEN, H .
BONE, 1995, 16 (03) :385-390
[2]  
ALOIA JF, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1392
[3]   Body composition by DEXA in older adults: Accuracy and influence of scan mode [J].
Clasey, JL ;
Hartman, ML ;
Kanaley, J ;
Wideman, L ;
Teates, CD ;
Bouchard, C ;
Weltman, A .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1997, 29 (04) :560-567
[4]  
DRINKWATER DT, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, pS352
[5]   ESTIMATION OF TOTAL BODY FAT FROM POTASSIUM-40 CONTENT [J].
FORBES, GB ;
GALLUP, J ;
HURSH, JB .
SCIENCE, 1961, 133 (344) :101-&
[6]  
GODDSITT MM, 1992, MED PHYS, V19, P35
[7]   DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS OF BODY-COMPOSITION - EFFECTS OF DEPTH AND TISSUE THICKNESS, INCLUDING COMPARISONS WITH DIRECT ANALYSIS [J].
JEBB, SA ;
GOLDBERG, GR ;
JENNINGS, G ;
ELIA, M .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 88 (03) :319-324
[8]   IMPACT OF CHRONIC CIGARETTE-SMOKING ON BODY-COMPOSITION AND FUEL METABOLISM [J].
JENSEN, EX ;
FUSCH, C ;
JAEGER, P ;
PEHEIM, E ;
HORBER, FF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1995, 80 (07) :2181-2185
[9]  
MAZESS RB, 1981, CALCIFIED TISSUE INT, V33, P361
[10]   DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY FOR TOTAL-BODY AND REGIONAL BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE COMPOSITION [J].
MAZESS, RB ;
BARDEN, HS ;
BISEK, JP ;
HANSON, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1990, 51 (06) :1106-1112