A comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia

被引:31
作者
Fernandez-Guisasola, J [1 ]
Serrano, ML [1 ]
Cobo, B [1 ]
Muñoz, L [1 ]
Plaza, A [1 ]
Trigo, C [1 ]
del Valle, SG [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Hosp Alcorcon, Anesthesia Unit, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Madrid 28922, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200105000-00034
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We compared the analgesic efficacy and the degree of motor block achieved with epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine (Group B) versus 0.1% ropivacaine (Group R), both with 0.0002% fentanyl (2 mug/mL) in laboring patients. A prospective, double-blinded study was performed in 98 ASA physical status I-IT parturients who were divided randomly into two groups to receive either bupivacaine or ropivacaine after catheter location had been tested with an initial bolus of lidocaine and fentanyl. The infusion rate was 15 mL/h in every case. When pain was perceived, 5-mL boluses of the assigned epidural analgesic were administered every 10 min until analgesia was achieved. We recorded pain intensity, level of sensory block, degree of motor block, hemodynamic variables, secondary effects, mode of delivery, neonatal outcome, and patient satisfaction. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the factors analyzed. Highly effective analgesia was achieved in both groups with a small incidence of motor block. These findings suggest that bupivacaine may be more potent than ropivacaine.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1265
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BADER AM, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P724
[2]   Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Fusco, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (01) :11-13
[3]  
CAPOGNA G, 1998, BRIT J ANAESTH, V81, pA506
[4]  
COLUMB MO, 1995, ANESTH ANALG, V81, P883
[5]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[6]   COMPARATIVE MOTOR-BLOCKING EFFECTS OF BUPIVACAINE AND ROPIVACAINE, A NEW AMINO AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC, IN THE RAT AND DOG [J].
FELDMAN, HS ;
COVINO, BG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (11) :1047-1052
[7]   A double-blind comparison of 0.125% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia [J].
Gautier, P ;
De Kock, M ;
Van Steenberge, A ;
Fanard, L ;
Hody, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (03) :772-778
[8]   Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers [J].
Knudsen, K ;
Suurkula, MB ;
Blomberg, S ;
Sjovall, J ;
Edvardsson, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :507-514
[9]   Extradural pain relief in labour: Bupivacaine sparing by extradural fentanyl is dose dependent [J].
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Hawthorne, L ;
Dresner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :493-497
[10]   COMPARISON OF ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE IN EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOR THE RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOR [J].
MCCRAE, AF ;
JOZWIAK, H ;
MCCLURE, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (03) :261-265