The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes

被引:36
作者
Chinander, KR
Schweitzer, ME
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Management, Sch Business Adm, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Operat & Informat Management Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
input bias; outcome assessment; managerial judgment; performance reviews; quality;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00025-6
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this paper we identify an input bias, the systematic misuse of input information in judgments of outcome quality. In many settings irrelevant input measures, such as the amount of time an employee spends in the office, influence outcome assessments, such as performance reviews. Across four studies we find that input values subtly, but significantly distort judgments of outcome quality. Irrelevant input information predictably influences outcome assessments even when people recognize that input measures should not matter and believe that input information did not matter. We examine the mechanics of the input bias, and suggest that because input measures are often easy to manipulate or misrepresent, the input bias is likely to have broad implications for managerial judgment and decision making. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 253
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? [J].
Bless, H ;
Schwarz, N ;
Clore, GL ;
Golisano, V ;
Rabe, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (04) :665-679
[12]   THE CURSE OF KNOWLEDGE IN ECONOMIC SETTINGS - AN EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
LOEWENSTEIN, G ;
WEBER, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (05) :1232-1254
[13]   CONTROL - ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC APPROACHES [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (02) :134-149
[14]   PREFERENCES FOR PROXY ATTRIBUTES [J].
FISCHER, GW ;
DAMODARAN, N ;
LASKEY, KB ;
LINCOLN, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (02) :198-214
[15]   THROWING GOOD MONEY AFTER BAD - THE EFFECT OF SUNK COSTS ON THE DECISION TO ESCALATE COMMITMENT TO AN ONGOING PROJECT [J].
GARLAND, H .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (06) :728-731
[16]  
GRAVES SB, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P417, DOI 10.5465/256557
[17]   ARE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS MYOPIC - A TIME-SERIES STUDY OF 4 TECHNOLOGY-DRIVEN INDUSTRIES [J].
HANSEN, GS ;
HILL, CWL .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 12 (01) :1-16
[18]   HINDSIGHT - BIASED JUDGMENTS OF PAST EVENTS AFTER THE OUTCOMES ARE KNOWN [J].
HAWKINS, SA ;
HASTIE, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1990, 107 (03) :311-327
[19]   Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis [J].
Hsee, CK ;
Loewenstein, GF ;
Blount, S ;
Bazerman, MH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (05) :576-590
[20]   ELASTIC JUSTIFICATION - HOW TEMPTING BUT TASK-IRRELEVANT FACTORS INFLUENCE DECISIONS [J].
HSEE, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 62 (03) :330-337