Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition

被引:283
作者
Gómez, RL
Gerken, L
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Psychol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01467-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The rapidity with which children acquire language is one of the mysteries of human cognition. A view held widely for the past 30 years is that children master language by means of a language-specific learning device. An earlier proposal, which has generated renewed interest, is that children make use of domain-general. associative learning mechanisms. However, our current lack of knowledge of the actual reaming mechanisms involved during infancy makes it difficult to determine the relative contributions of innate and acquired knowledge. A recent approach to studying this problem exposes infants to artificial languages and assesses the resulting learning. In this article, we review studies using this paradigm that have led to a number of exciting discoveries regarding the learning mechanisms available during infancy. These studies raise important issues with respect to whether such mechanisms are general or specific to language, the extent to which they reflect statistical learning versus symbol manipulation, and the extent to which suck mechanisms change with development. The fine-grained characterizations of infant learning mechanisms that this approach permits should result in a better understanding of the relative contributions of, and the dynamic between, innate and learned factors in language acquisition.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]  
Marcus GF, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P436
[32]   Connectionism: with or without rules? Response to J.L. McClelland and D.C. Plaut (1999) [J].
Marcus, GF .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (05) :168-170
[33]   Transfer of learning: rule acquisition or statistical learning? Reply [J].
Marcus, GF .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (08) :290-291
[34]   Can connectionism save constructivism? [J].
Marcus, GF .
COGNITION, 1998, 66 (02) :153-182
[35]   Does generalization in infant learning implicate abstract algebra-like rules? [J].
McClelland, JL ;
Plaut, DC .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (05) :166-168
[36]  
Moeschler Jacques., CAMBRIDGE HDB LANGUA
[37]  
Morgan J. L., 1996, SIGNAL SYNTAX BOOTST
[38]  
Negishi M, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P435
[39]  
NELSON DGK, 1995, INFANT BEHAV DEV, V18, P111
[40]  
PINKER S., 1984, LANGUAGE LEARNABILIT