The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: A preliminary investigation

被引:110
作者
Cruess, Richard [1 ]
Mcllroy, Jodi Herold [1 ]
Cruess, Sylvia [1 ]
Ginsburg, Shiphra [1 ]
Steinert, Yvonne [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Med Educ, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
关键词
CLINICAL-EVALUATION EXERCISE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; BEHAVIOR; RESIDENTS; FACULTY; RELIABILITY; DEFINITION; CURRICULUM; VALIDITY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1097/00001888-200610001-00019
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background As the evaluation of professional behaviors has been identified as an area for development, the Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) was developed using the mini-Clinical Examination Exercise (mini-CEX) format. Method From a set of 142 observable behaviors reflective of professionalism identified at a McGill workshop, 24 were converted into an evaluation instrument modeled on the mini-CEX. This instrument, designed for use in multiple settings, was tested on clinical clerks in medicine, surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, psychiatry, and pediatrics. in all, 211 forms were completed on 74 students by 47 evaluators. Results Results indicate content and construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 4 factors: doctor-patient relationship skills, reflective skills, time management, and interprofessional relationship skills. A decision study showed confidence intervals sufficiently narrow for many measurement purposes with as few as 8 observations. Four items frequently marked below expectations may be identifiers for "problem" students. Conclusion This preliminary study suggests that the P-MEX is a feasible format for evaluating professionalism in clinical training.
引用
收藏
页码:S74 / S78
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
Freidson E., 1994, PROFESSIONALISM REBO
[12]   Initial use of a novel instrument to measure professionalism in surgical residents [J].
Gauger, PG ;
Gruppen, LD ;
Minter, RM ;
Colletti, LM ;
Stern, DT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 189 (04) :479-487
[13]   Context, conflict, and resolution: A new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism [J].
Ginsburg, S ;
Regehr, G ;
Hatala, R ;
McNaughton, N ;
Frohna, A ;
Hodges, B ;
Lingard, L ;
Stern, D .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (10) :S6-S11
[14]   Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise [J].
Holmboe, ES ;
Yepes, M ;
Williams, F ;
Huot, SJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (05) :558-561
[15]   Professional behavior - A learner's permit for licensure [J].
Kirk, LM ;
Blank, LL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (25) :2709-2711
[16]   Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mCEX) in a medicine core clerkship [J].
Kogan, JR ;
Bellini, LM ;
Shea, JA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (10) :S33-S35
[17]  
KROBOTH FJ, 1992, J GEN INT MED, V117, P757
[18]   Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature [J].
Lynch, DC ;
Surdyk, PM ;
Eiser, AR .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2004, 26 (04) :366-373
[19]   Achievement of non-cognitive goals of undergraduate medical education: perceptions of medical students, residents, faculty and other health professionals [J].
Mann, KV ;
Ruedy, J ;
Millar, N ;
Andreou, P .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (01) :40-48
[20]  
*NAT BOARD MED EX, 2003, REP INV C COSP ASS A