Patient radiation exposure measurements during interventional procedures: A prospective study

被引:19
作者
Efstathopoulos, Efstathios P.
Brountzos, Elias N.
Alexopoulou, Efthimia
Argentos, Stylianos
Kelekis, Dimitrios A.
Raptou, Panagiota D.
Kelekis, Nikolaos L.
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Gen Univ Hosp Attikon, Dept Radiol 2, Athens 12462, Greece
[2] KAT Gen Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Athens 14561, Greece
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2006年 / 91卷 / 01期
关键词
dosimetry; effective dose; medical radiation; x rays;
D O I
10.1097/01.HP.0000198783.10855.51
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
This is a prospective study with the purpose of assessing patient radiation dose and stochastic risk (risk for fatal cancer) in a patient population undergoing interventional radiological (IR) procedures. Measurements were performed on 36 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA, n = 18), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS, n = 3), diagnostic angiography (DA, n = 6), arterial embolization (AE, n = 3), and hepatic neoplasm chemoembolization (HCE, n = 6). Kerma area product (KAP) was used as a measure of x-ray exposure to the patient. Mean KAP value per procedure was 79 +/- 50 Gy cm(-2) for PTA, 139 +/- 55 Gy cm(-2) for TIPS, 110 +/- 44 Gy cm(-2) for DA, 325 +/- 145 Gy cm(-2) for AE, and 150 +/- 76 Gy cm(-2) for HCE. Forty-six percent of total KAP value was attributed to fluoroscopy. In conclusion, we showed that a linear correlation between effective dose and KAP was found (r(2) = 0.84), which could be used for estimating patient effective dose using KAP measurements. Small changes to the number of digital frames acquired result in substantial change of the total KAP in interventional radiological procedures. Stochastic risk from IR procedures is quite low for the patient. Measuring KAP is a simple and accurate method, which provides the interventional radiologist with a good estimation of the patient's relative risk for stochastic effects.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[2]
*BIER 5 COMM BIOL, 1990, HLTH EFF EXP LOW LEV
[3]
Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[4]
Estimation of effective dose in some digital angiographic and interventional procedures [J].
Cruces, RR ;
García-Granados, J ;
Romero, FJD ;
Armas, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (841) :42-47
[5]
Medical exposures directive: Implications for interventional radiology [J].
Dowling, A ;
Malone, JF .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 94 (1-2) :19-23
[6]
Medical personnel and patient dosimetry during coronary angiography and intervention [J].
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Makrygiannis, SS ;
Kottou, S ;
Karvouni, E ;
Giazitzoglou, E ;
Korovesis, S ;
Tzanalaridou, E ;
Raptou, PD ;
Katritsis, DG .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (18) :3059-3068
[7]
A SURVEY OF FILMS FOR USE AS DOSIMETERS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY [J].
FAJARDO, LC ;
GEISE, RA ;
RITENOUR, ER .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1995, 68 (04) :595-599
[8]
Deterministic effects in interventional radiology [J].
Faulkner, K ;
Vañó, E .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 94 (1-2) :95-98
[9]
Comparison of four techniques to estimate radiation dose to skin during angiographic and interventional radiology procedures [J].
Fletcher, DW ;
Miller, DL ;
Balter, S ;
Taylor, MA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) :391-397
[10]
Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology [J].
Gkanatsios, NA ;
Huda, W ;
Peters, KR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :717-723